[PATCH v2 1/4] mm: Check for node_online in node_present_pages

[Michal Hocko]

On Wed 18-03-20 16:32:15, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Michal Hocko <mhocko at suse.com> [2020-03-18 11:02:56]:
> 
> > On Wed 18-03-20 12:58:07, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
[...]
> > > -#define node_present_pages(nid)	(NODE_DATA(nid)->node_present_pages)
> > > -#define node_spanned_pages(nid)	(NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages)
> > > +#define node_present_pages(nid)		\
> > > +	(node_online(nid) ? NODE_DATA(nid)->node_present_pages : 0)
> > > +#define node_spanned_pages(nid)		\
> > > +	(node_online(nid) ? NODE_DATA(nid)->node_spanned_pages : 0)
> >
> > I believe this is a wrong approach. We really do not want to special
> > case all the places which require NODE_DATA. Can we please go and
> > allocate pgdat for all possible nodes?
> >
> 
> I can do that but the question I had was should we make this change just for
> Powerpc or should the change be for other archs.

No, we shouldn't, really. If NODE_DATA is non-null for all possible
nodes then this shouldn't be really necessary and arch specific.

> NODE_DATA initialization always seems to be in arch specific code.
> 
> The other archs that are affected seem to be mips, sh and sparc
> These archs seem to have making an assumption that NODE_DATA has to be local
> only,

Which is all good and fine for nodes that hold some memory. If those
architectures support memory less nodes at all then I do not see any
problem to have remote pgdata.

> For example on sparc / arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c in allocate_node_data function.
> 
>   NODE_DATA(nid) = memblock_alloc_node(sizeof(struct pglist_data),
>                                              SMP_CACHE_BYTES, nid);
>         if (!NODE_DATA(nid)) {
>                 prom_printf("Cannot allocate pglist_data for nid[%d]\n", nid);
>                 prom_halt();
>         }
> 
>         NODE_DATA(nid)->node_id = nid;

This code is not about memroy less nodes, is it? It looks more like a
allocation failure panic-like handling because there is not enough
memory to hold pgdat. This also strongly suggests that this platform
doesn't really expect memory less nodes in the early init path.

> So even if I make changes to allocate NODE_DATA from fallback node, I may not
> be able to test them.

Please try to focus on the architecture you can test for. From the
existing reports I have seen this looks mostly to be a problem for x86
and ppc
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs