[PATCH -next] soc: fsl: dpio: remove set but not used variable 'addr_cena'
Li Yang
leoyang.li at nxp.com
Tue Mar 10 09:33:49 AEDT 2020
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:38 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> commit 3b2abda7d28c ("soc: fsl: dpio: Replace QMAN array
> mode with ring mode enqueue") introduced this, but not
> used, so remove it.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> index 740ee0d..350de56 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/dpio/qbman-portal.c
> @@ -658,7 +658,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
> const uint32_t *cl = (uint32_t *)d;
> uint32_t eqcr_ci, eqcr_pi, half_mask, full_mask;
> int i, num_enqueued = 0;
> - uint64_t addr_cena;
>
> spin_lock(&s->access_spinlock);
> half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
> @@ -711,7 +710,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>
> /* Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */
> eqcr_pi = s->eqcr.pi;
> - addr_cena = (size_t)s->addr_cena;
> for (i = 0; i < num_enqueued; i++)
> eqcr_pi++;
> s->eqcr.pi = eqcr_pi & full_mask;
> @@ -822,7 +820,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
> const uint32_t *cl;
> uint32_t eqcr_ci, eqcr_pi, half_mask, full_mask;
> int i, num_enqueued = 0;
> - uint64_t addr_cena;
>
> half_mask = (s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask>>1);
> full_mask = s->eqcr.pi_ci_mask;
> @@ -866,7 +863,6 @@ int qbman_swp_enqueue_multiple_desc_direct(struct qbman_swp *s,
>
> /* Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */
> eqcr_pi = s->eqcr.pi;
> - addr_cena = (uint64_t)s->addr_cena;
Hi Youri,
Looks like this problem exposed another issue that you removed the
cacheline related code in the upstream version. Then the comment /*
Flush all the cacheline without load/store in between */ is no longer
true now, and probably the whole block can be replaced with a single
line to increase s->eqcr.pi? The same for the block above. Can you
provide a better fix for this issue?
Regards,
Leo
> for (i = 0; i < num_enqueued; i++)
> eqcr_pi++;
> s->eqcr.pi = eqcr_pi & full_mask;
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list