[RFC 02/11] perf/core: Data structure to present hazard data
Ravi Bangoria
ravi.bangoria at linux.ibm.com
Wed Mar 4 01:32:58 AEDT 2020
On 3/2/20 8:18 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> index 377d794d3105..ff252618ca93 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
>> @@ -142,8 +142,9 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
>> PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR = 1U << 18,
>> PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR = 1U << 19,
>> PERF_SAMPLE_AUX = 1U << 20,
>> + PERF_SAMPLE_PIPELINE_HAZ = 1U << 21,
>
> Can we please have perf_event_open() reject this sample flag for PMUs
> without the new callback (introduced in the next patch)?
>
> That way it'll be possible to detect whether the PMU exposes this.
Sure. Will change it.
Ravi
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list