[PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Tue Jun 30 11:31:15 AEST 2020
kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com> writes:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> [also build test ERROR on scottwood/next v5.8-rc2 next-20200626]
> [cannot apply to kvm-ppc/kvm-ppc-next]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicholas-Piggin/powerpc-pseries-IPI-doorbell-improvements/20200627-230544
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: powerpc-randconfig-c003-20200628 (attached as .config)
> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>
> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:38:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_global_ipi':
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:114:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 114 | u32 tag = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | raw_smp_processor_id
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_try_core_ipi':
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'; did you mean 'cpu_online_mask'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 146 | if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | cpu_online_mask
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_test_cpu' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> 146 | if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seems like CONFIG_SMP=n is probably the root cause.
You could try including asm/smp.h, but good chance that will lead to
header soup.
Other option would be to wrap the whole lot in #ifdef CONFIG_SMP?
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list