[PATCH v 1/1] powerpc/64s: allow for clang's objdump differences

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Fri Jul 24 20:48:04 AEST 2020


Hi Bill,

Bill Wendling <morbo at google.com> writes:
> Clang's objdump emits slightly different output from GNU's objdump,
> causing a list of warnings to be emitted during relocatable builds.
> E.g., clang's objdump emits this:
>
>    c000000000000004: 2c 00 00 48  b  0xc000000000000030
>    ...
>    c000000000005c6c: 10 00 82 40  bf 2, 0xc000000000005c7c
>
> while GNU objdump emits:
>
>    c000000000000004: 2c 00 00 48  b    c000000000000030 <__start+0x30>
>    ...
>    c000000000005c6c: 10 00 82 40  bne  c000000000005c7c <masked_interrupt+0x3c>
>
> Adjust llvm-objdump's output to remove the extraneous '0x' and convert
> 'bf' and 'bt' to 'bne' and 'beq' resp. to more closely match GNU
> objdump's output.
>
> Note that clang's objdump doesn't yet output the relocation symbols on
> PPC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo at google.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/tools/unrel_branch_check.sh | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/tools/unrel_branch_check.sh b/arch/powerpc/tools/unrel_branch_check.sh
> index 77114755dc6f..71ce86b68d18 100755
> --- a/arch/powerpc/tools/unrel_branch_check.sh
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/tools/unrel_branch_check.sh
> @@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ grep -e "^c[0-9a-f]*:[[:space:]]*\([0-9a-f][0-9a-f][[:space:]]\)\{4\}[[:space:]]
>  grep -v '\<__start_initialization_multiplatform>' |
>  grep -v -e 'b.\?.\?ctr' |
>  grep -v -e 'b.\?.\?lr' |
> +sed 's/\bbt.\?[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]][[:digit:]]*,/beq/' |
> +sed 's/\bbf.\?[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]][[:digit:]]*,/bne/' |
> +sed 's/[[:space:]]0x/ /' |
>  sed 's/://' |

I know you followed the example in the script of just doing everything
as a separate entry in the pipeline, but I think we could consolidate
all the seds into one?

eg:

sed -e 's/\bbt.\?[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]][[:digit:]]*,/beq/' \
    -e 's/\bbf.\?[[:space:]]*[[:digit:]][[:digit:]]*,/bne/' \
    -e 's/[[:space:]]0x/ /' \
    -e 's/://' |

Does that work?

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list