[PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc/powernv/idle: Rename pnv_first_spr_loss_level variable
Pratik Sampat
psampat at linux.ibm.com
Tue Jul 21 20:29:10 AEST 2020
On 20/07/20 5:27 am, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Pratik Rajesh Sampat's message of July 18, 2020 4:53 am:
>> Replace the variable name from using "pnv_first_spr_loss_level" to
>> "pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level".
>>
>> As pnv_first_spr_loss_level is supposed to be the earliest state that
>> has OPAL_PM_LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT set, however as shallow states too loose
>> SPR values, render an incorrect terminology.
> It also doesn't lose "full" state at this loss level though. From the
> architecture it could be called "hv state loss level", but in POWER10
> even that is not strictly true.
>
Right. Just discovered that deep stop states won't loose full state
P10 onwards.
Would it better if we rename it as "pnv_all_spr_loss_state" instead
so that it stays generic enough while being semantically coherent?
Thanks
Pratik
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> index f62904f70fc6..d439e11af101 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static bool default_stop_found;
>> * First stop state levels when SPR and TB loss can occur.
>> */
>> static u64 pnv_first_tb_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>> -static u64 pnv_first_spr_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>> +static u64 pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>>
>> /*
>> * psscr value and mask of the deepest stop idle state.
>> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
>> */
>> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
>> }
>> - if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
>> + if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level) {
>> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
>> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
>> sprs.fscr = mfspr(SPRN_FSCR);
>> @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
>> * just always test PSSCR for SPR/TB state loss.
>> */
>> pls = (psscr & PSSCR_PLS) >> PSSCR_PLS_SHIFT;
>> - if (likely(pls < pnv_first_spr_loss_level)) {
>> + if (likely(pls < pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level)) {
>> if (sprs_saved)
>> atomic_stop_thread_idle();
>> goto out;
>> @@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ static void __init pnv_power9_idle_init(void)
>> * the deepest loss-less (OPAL_PM_STOP_INST_FAST) stop state.
>> */
>> pnv_first_tb_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>> - pnv_first_spr_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>> + pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level = MAX_STOP_STATE + 1;
>> for (i = 0; i < nr_pnv_idle_states; i++) {
>> int err;
>> struct pnv_idle_states_t *state = &pnv_idle_states[i];
>> @@ -1099,8 +1099,8 @@ static void __init pnv_power9_idle_init(void)
>> pnv_first_tb_loss_level = psscr_rl;
>>
>> if ((state->flags & OPAL_PM_LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT) &&
>> - (pnv_first_spr_loss_level > psscr_rl))
>> - pnv_first_spr_loss_level = psscr_rl;
>> + (pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level > psscr_rl))
>> + pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level = psscr_rl;
>>
>> /*
>> * The idle code does not deal with TB loss occurring
>> @@ -1111,8 +1111,8 @@ static void __init pnv_power9_idle_init(void)
>> * compatibility.
>> */
>> if ((state->flags & OPAL_PM_TIMEBASE_STOP) &&
>> - (pnv_first_spr_loss_level > psscr_rl))
>> - pnv_first_spr_loss_level = psscr_rl;
>> + (pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level > psscr_rl))
>> + pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level = psscr_rl;
>>
>> err = validate_psscr_val_mask(&state->psscr_val,
>> &state->psscr_mask,
>> @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ static void __init pnv_power9_idle_init(void)
>> }
>>
>> pr_info("cpuidle-powernv: First stop level that may lose SPRs = 0x%llx\n",
>> - pnv_first_spr_loss_level);
>> + pnv_first_fullstate_loss_level);
>>
>> pr_info("cpuidle-powernv: First stop level that may lose timebase = 0x%llx\n",
>> pnv_first_tb_loss_level);
>> --
>> 2.25.4
>>
>>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list