[powerpc:next-test 125/127] arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c:392:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pkey_enabled'; did you mean

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

On 7/17/20 7:29 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next-test
> head:   0fbd1eb4df96e1cbd039e0b95fdf62cf65a7faf9
> commit: ed411c66eea2ccf93a634ae661a1f79c2bc63d88 [125/127] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Remove is_pkey_enabled()
> config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>          wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>          git checkout ed411c66eea2ccf93a634ae661a1f79c2bc63d88
>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>     arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c: In function 'pkey_access_permitted':
>>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c:392:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pkey_enabled'; did you mean 'arch_pkeys_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>       392 |  if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey))
>           |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>           |       arch_pkeys_enabled
>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> vim +392 arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c
> 


We removed that upstream in

19ab500edb5d6020010caba48ce3b4ce4182ab63     powerpc/mm/pkeys: Make pkey 
access check work on execute_only_key


next-test need to be rebased?

-aneesh