[PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel
Hari Bathini
hbathini at linux.ibm.com
Fri Jul 17 07:10:06 AEST 2020
On 16/07/20 4:22 am, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> Hari Bathini <hbathini at linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
<snip>
>> +/**
>> + * get_node_path - Get the full path of the given node.
>> + * @dn: Node.
>> + * @path: Updated with the full path of the node.
>> + *
>> + * Returns nothing.
>> + */
>> +static void get_node_path(struct device_node *dn, char *path)
>> +{
>> + if (!dn)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + get_node_path(dn->parent, path);
>
> Is it ok to do recursion in the kernel? In this case I believe it's not
> problematic since the maximum call depth will be the maximum depth of a
> device tree node which shouldn't be too much. Also, there are no local
> variables in this function. But I thought it was worth mentioning.
You are right. We are better off avoiding the recursion here. Will
change it to an iterative version instead.
>> + * each representing a memory range.
>> + */
>> + ranges = (len >> 2) / (n_mem_addr_cells + n_mem_size_cells);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ranges; i++) {
>> + base = of_read_number(prop, n_mem_addr_cells);
>> + prop += n_mem_addr_cells;
>> + end = base + of_read_number(prop, n_mem_size_cells) - 1;
prop is not used after the above.
> You need to `prop += n_mem_size_cells` here.
But yeah, adding it would make it look complete in some sense..
Thanks
Hari
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list