[PATCH 2/2] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: rework secure mem slot dropping

Laurent Dufour ldufour at linux.ibm.com
Wed Jul 8 22:16:36 AEST 2020


Le 08/07/2020 à 13:25, Bharata B Rao a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 05:59:14PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> When a secure memslot is dropped, all the pages backed in the secure device
>> (aka really backed by secure memory by the Ultravisor) should be paged out
>> to a normal page. Previously, this was achieved by triggering the page
>> fault mechanism which is calling kvmppc_svm_page_out() on each pages.
>>
>> This can't work when hot unplugging a memory slot because the memory slot
>> is flagged as invalid and gfn_to_pfn() is then not trying to access the
>> page, so the page fault mechanism is not triggered.
>>
>> Since the final goal is to make a call to kvmppc_svm_page_out() it seems
>> simpler to directly calling it instead of triggering such a mechanism. This
>> way kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages() can be called even when hot unplugging a
>> memslot.
> 
> Yes, this appears much simpler.

Thanks Bharata for reviewing this.

> 
>>
>> Since kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages() is already holding kvm->arch.uvmem_lock,
>> the call to __kvmppc_svm_page_out() is made.
>> As __kvmppc_svm_page_out needs the vma pointer to migrate the pages, the
>> VMA is fetched in a lazy way, to not trigger find_vma() all the time. In
>> addition, the mmap_sem is help in read mode during that time, not in write
>> mode since the virual memory layout is not impacted, and
>> kvm->arch.uvmem_lock prevents concurrent operation on the secure device.
>>
>> Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata at linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus at ozlabs.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>   1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
>> index 852cc9ae6a0b..479ddf16d18c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c
>> @@ -533,35 +533,55 @@ static inline int kvmppc_svm_page_out(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>    * fault on them, do fault time migration to replace the device PTEs in
>>    * QEMU page table with normal PTEs from newly allocated pages.
>>    */
>> -void kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
>> +void kvmppc_uvmem_drop_pages(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>>   			     struct kvm *kvm, bool skip_page_out)
>>   {
>>   	int i;
>>   	struct kvmppc_uvmem_page_pvt *pvt;
>> -	unsigned long pfn, uvmem_pfn;
>> -	unsigned long gfn = free->base_gfn;
>> +	struct page *uvmem_page;
>> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = NULL;
>> +	unsigned long uvmem_pfn, gfn;
>> +	unsigned long addr, end;
>> +
>> +	down_read(&kvm->mm->mmap_sem);
> 
> You should be using mmap_read_lock(kvm->mm) with recent kernels.

Absolutely, shame on me, I reviewed Michel's series about that!

Paul, Michael, could you fix that when pulling this patch or should I sent a 
whole new series?

> 
>> +
>> +	addr = slot->userspace_addr;
>> +	end = addr + (slot->npages * PAGE_SIZE);
>>   
>> -	for (i = free->npages; i; --i, ++gfn) {
>> -		struct page *uvmem_page;
>> +	gfn = slot->base_gfn;
>> +	for (i = slot->npages; i; --i, ++gfn, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> +
>> +		/* Fetch the VMA if addr is not in the latest fetched one */
>> +		if (!vma || (addr < vma->vm_start || addr >= vma->vm_end)) {
>> +			vma = find_vma_intersection(kvm->mm, addr, end);
>> +			if (!vma ||
>> +			    vma->vm_start > addr || vma->vm_end < end) {
>> +				pr_err("Can't find VMA for gfn:0x%lx\n", gfn);
>> +				break;
>> +			}
>> +		}
> 
> The first find_vma_intersection() was called for the range spanning the
> entire memslot, but you have code to check if vma remains valid for the
> new addr in each iteration. Guess you wanted to get vma for one page at
> a time and use it for subsequent pages until it covers the range?

That's the goal, fetch the VMA once and no more until we reach its end boundary.


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list