[PATCH v3 04/27] ocxl: Remove unnecessary externs

Alastair D'Silva alastair at d-silva.org
Wed Feb 26 19:26:34 AEDT 2020


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, 26 February 2020 7:15 PM
> To: Alastair D'Silva <alastair at au1.ibm.com>
> Cc: alastair at d-silva.org; Aneesh Kumar K . V
> <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com>; Oliver O'Halloran <oohall at gmail.com>;
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>; Paul Mackerras
> <paulus at samba.org>; Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>; Frederic
> Barrat <fbarrat at linux.ibm.com>; Andrew Donnellan <ajd at linux.ibm.com>;
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>; Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com>;
> Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma at intel.com>; Dave Jiang
> <dave.jiang at intel.com>; Ira Weiny <ira.weiny at intel.com>; Andrew Morton
> <akpm at linux-foundation.org>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org>; David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>;
> Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>; Anton Blanchard <anton at ozlabs.org>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>; Mahesh Salgaonkar
> <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Madhavan Srinivasan
> <maddy at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Cédric Le Goater <clg at kaod.org>; Anju T
> Sudhakar <anju at linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hari Bathini
> <hbathini at linux.ibm.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>; Greg
> Kurz <groug at kaod.org>; Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>; Masahiro
> Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>; Alexey Kardashevskiy
> <aik at ozlabs.ru>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> dev at lists.ozlabs.org; linux-nvdimm at lists.01.org; linux-mm at kvack.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/27] ocxl: Remove unnecessary externs
> 
> On 02/21/20 at 02:26pm, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
> > From: Alastair D'Silva <alastair at d-silva.org>
> >
> > Function declarations don't need externs, remove the existing ones so
> > they are consistent with newer code
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alastair D'Silva <alastair at d-silva.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h | 32 ++++++++++++++---------------
> >  include/misc/ocxl.h                 |  6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > index 0b2a6707e555..b23c99bc0c84 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> > @@ -9,29 +9,27 @@
> >  #define PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE       4
> >  #define PNV_OCXL_TL_RATE_BUF_SIZE
> ((PNV_OCXL_TL_MAX_TEMPLATE+1) * PNV_OCXL_TL_BITS_PER_RATE / 8)
> >
> > -extern int pnv_ocxl_get_actag(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 *base, u16
> *enabled,
> > -			u16 *supported);
> 
> It works w or w/o extern when declare functions. Searching 'extern'
> under include can find so many functions with 'extern' adding. Do we have
a
> explicit standard if we should add or remove 'exter' in function
declaration?
> 
> I have no objection to this patch, just want to make clear so that I can
handle
> it w/o confusion.
> 
> Thanks
> Baoquan
> 

For the OpenCAPI driver, we have settled on not having 'extern' on
functions.

I don't think I've seen a standard that supports or refutes this, but it
does not value add.

-- 
Alastair D'Silva           mob: 0423 762 819
skype: alastair_dsilva     msn: alastair at d-silva.org
blog: http://alastair.d-silva.org    Twitter: @EvilDeece






More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list