[PATCH v2] clk: renesas: r9a06g032: Drop __packed for portability
Geert Uytterhoeven
geert at linux-m68k.org
Sat Dec 5 20:05:29 AEDT 2020
Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:24 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org> wrote:
> Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2020-11-30 00:57:43)
> > The R9A06G032 clock driver uses an array of packed structures to reduce
> > kernel size. However, this array contains pointers, which are no longer
> > aligned naturally, and cannot be relocated on PPC64. Hence when
> > compile-testing this driver on PPC64 with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y (e.g.
> > PowerPC allyesconfig), the following warnings are produced:
> >
> > WARNING: 136 bad relocations
> > c000000000616be3 R_PPC64_UADDR64 .rodata+0x00000000000cf338
> > c000000000616bfe R_PPC64_UADDR64 .rodata+0x00000000000cf370
> > ...
> >
> > Fix this by dropping the __packed attribute from the r9a06g032_clkdesc
> > definition, trading a small size increase for portability.
> >
> > This increases the 156-entry clock table by 1 byte per entry, but due to
> > the compiler generating more efficient code for unpacked accesses, the
> > net size increase is only 76 bytes (gcc 9.3.0 on arm32).
> >
> > Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
> > Fixes: 4c3d88526eba2143 ("clk: renesas: Renesas R9A06G032 clock driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas at glider.be>
> > ---
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
>
> Unless you want me to pick this up for clk-fixes?
Yes please. Forgot to retain this comment for v2:
"Please take directly (ppc or clk), as this is a build fix.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20201128122819.32187696@canb.auug.org.au/"
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list