[PATCH v2 00/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable fixes
Anshuman Khandual
anshuman.khandual at arm.com
Fri Aug 21 13:33:24 AEST 2020
On 08/19/2020 07:15 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> This patch series includes fixes for debug_vm_pgtable test code so that
>> they follow page table updates rules correctly. The first two patches introduce
>> changes w.r.t ppc64. The patches are included in this series for completeness. We can
>> merge them via ppc64 tree if required.
>>
>> Hugetlb test is disabled on ppc64 because that needs larger change to satisfy
>> page table update rules.
>>
>> Changes from V1:
>> * Address review feedback
>> * drop test specific pfn_pte and pfn_pmd.
>> * Update ppc64 page table helper to add _PAGE_PTE
>>
>> Aneesh Kumar K.V (13):
>> powerpc/mm: Add DEBUG_VM WARN for pmd_clear
>> powerpc/mm: Move setting pte specific flags to pfn_pte
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/ppc64: Avoid setting top bits in radom value
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtables/hugevmap: Use the arch helper to identify huge
>> vmap support.
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/savedwrite: Enable savedwrite test with
>> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/THP: Mark the pte entry huge before using
>> set_pmd/pud_at
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/set_pte/pmd/pud: Don't use set_*_at to update an
>> existing pte entry
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/thp: Use page table depost/withdraw with THP
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Move non page table modifying test together
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Take correct page table lock
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/pmd_clear: Don't use pmd/pud_clear on pte entries
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable/hugetlb: Disable hugetlb test on ppc64
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable: populate a pte entry before fetching it
>>
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h | 29 +++-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h | 5 -
>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c | 2 +-
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 5 -
>> include/linux/io.h | 12 ++
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 151 +++++++++++--------
>> 6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>>
>
> BTW I picked a wrong branch when sending this. Attaching the diff
> against what I want to send. pfn_pmd() no more updates _PAGE_PTE
> because that is handled by pmd_mkhuge().
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> index 3b4da7c63e28..e18ae50a275c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ pmd_t pfn_pmd(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t pgprot)
> unsigned long pmdv;
>
> pmdv = (pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & PTE_RPN_MASK;
> - return __pmd(pmdv | pgprot_val(pgprot) | _PAGE_PTE);
> + return pmd_set_protbits(__pmd(pmdv), pgprot);
> }
>
> pmd_t mk_pmd(struct page *page, pgprot_t pgprot)
> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> index 7d9f8e1d790f..cad61d22f33a 100644
> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
>
> static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - pmd_t pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, prot);
> + pmd_t pmd = pmd_mkhuge(pfn_pmd(pfn, prot));
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING))
> return;
>
Cover letter does not mention which branch or tag this series applies on.
Just assumed it to be 5.9-rc1. Should the above changes be captured as a
pre-requisite patch ?
Anyways, the series fails to be build on arm64.
A) Without CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c: In function ‘debug_vm_pgtable’:
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c:1045:2: error: too many arguments to function ‘pmd_advanced_tests’
pmd_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pmdp, pmd_aligned, vaddr, prot, saved_ptep);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c:366:20: note: declared here
static void __init pmd_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B) As mentioned previously, this should be solved by including <linux/io.h>
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c: In function ‘pmd_huge_tests’:
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c:215:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_ioremap_pmd_supported’; did you mean ‘arch_disable_smp_support’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!arch_ioremap_pmd_supported())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please make sure that the series builds on all enabled platforms i.e x86,
arm64, ppc32, ppc64, arc, s390 along with selectively enabling/disabling
all the features that make various #ifdefs in the test.
- Anshuman
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list