[PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Properly return error code from do_patch_instruction()
Naveen N. Rao
naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Sat Apr 25 04:07:06 AEST 2020
Hi Steve,
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:21:14 +0200
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote:
>
>> Le 23/04/2020 à 17:09, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
>> > With STRICT_KERNEL_RWX, we are currently ignoring return value from
>> > __patch_instruction() in do_patch_instruction(), resulting in the error
>> > not being propagated back. Fix the same.
>>
>> Good patch.
>>
>> Be aware that there is ongoing work which tend to wanting to replace
>> error reporting by BUG_ON() . See
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=166003
>
> Thanks for the reference. I still believe that WARN_ON() should be used in
> 99% of the cases, including here. And only do a BUG_ON() when you know
> there's no recovering from it.
I'm not sure if you meant that we should have a WARN_ON() in
patch_instruction(), or if it was about the users of
patch_instruction(). As you're well aware, ftrace likes to do its own
WARN_ON() if any of its operations fail through ftrace_bug(). That was
the reason I didn't add anything here.
- Naveen
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list