[PATCH 19/28] gpu/drm: remove the powerpc hack in drm_legacy_sg_alloc

[Daniel Vetter]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:19 PM Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 5:41 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:54 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 14:25 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2020 at 01:59:17PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > If this code was broken for non-coherent caches a crude powerpc hack
> > > > > isn't going to help anyone else.  Remove the hack as it is the last
> > > > > user of __vmalloc passing a page protection flag other than PAGE_KERNEL.
> > > >
> > > > Well Ben added this to make stuff work on ppc, ofc the home grown dma
> > > > layer in drm from back then isn't going to work in other places. I guess
> > > > should have at least an ack from him, in case anyone still cares about
> > > > this on ppc. Adding Ben to cc.
> > >
> > > This was due to some drivers (radeon ?) trying to use vmalloc pages for
> > > coherent DMA, which means on those 4xx powerpc's need to be non-cached.
> > >
> > > There were machines using that (440 based iirc), though I honestly
> > > can't tell if anybody still uses any of it.
> >
> > agp subsystem still seems to happily do that (vmalloc memory for
> > device access), never having been ported to dma apis (or well
> > converted to iommu drivers, which they kinda are really). So I think
> > this all still works exactly as back then, even with the kms radeon
> > drivers. Question really is whether we have users left, and I have no
> > clue about that either.
> >
> > Now if these boxes didn't ever have agp then I think we can get away
> > with deleting this, since we've already deleted the legacy radeon
> > driver. And that one used vmalloc for everything. The new kms one does
> > use the dma-api if the gpu isn't connected through agp.
>
> All radeons have a built in remapping table to handle non-AGP systems.
> On the earlier radeons it wasn't quite as performant as AGP, but it
> was always more reliable because AGP is AGP.  Maybe it's time to let
> AGP go?

I'd be very much in favour of that, if we can just use the integrated
gart and drop agp fast writes wobbliness on the floor. I think the
only other modern driver using agp would be nouveau at that point.
-Daniel

>
> Alex
>
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Ben.
> > >
> > > > -Daniel
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c | 11 +----------
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c
> > > > > index ca520028b2cb..f4e6184d1877 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_scatter.c
> > > > > @@ -43,15 +43,6 @@
> > > > >
> > > > >  #define DEBUG_SCATTER 0
> > > > >
> > > > > -static inline void *drm_vmalloc_dma(unsigned long size)
> > > > > -{
> > > > > -#if defined(__powerpc__) && defined(CONFIG_NOT_COHERENT_CACHE)
> > > > > -   return __vmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL, pgprot_noncached_wc(PAGE_KERNEL));
> > > > > -#else
> > > > > -   return vmalloc_32(size);
> > > > > -#endif
> > > > > -}
> > > > > -
> > > > >  static void drm_sg_cleanup(struct drm_sg_mem * entry)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >     struct page *page;
> > > > > @@ -126,7 +117,7 @@ int drm_legacy_sg_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > > > >             return -ENOMEM;
> > > > >     }
> > > > >
> > > > > -   entry->virtual = drm_vmalloc_dma(pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > > +   entry->virtual = vmalloc_32(pages << PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > > >     if (!entry->virtual) {
> > > > >             kfree(entry->busaddr);
> > > > >             kfree(entry->pagelist);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch