[PATCH v2] sched/core: fix illegal RCU from offline CPUs
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Apr 2 22:24:00 AEDT 2020
Qian Cai <cai at lca.pw> writes:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
>
> In the CPU-offline process, it calls mmdrop() after idle entry and the
> subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Once execution passes the
> call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring the CPU, which results in
> lockdep complaining when mmdrop() uses RCU from either memcg or
> debugobjects below.
>
> Fix it by cleaning up the active_mm state from BP instead. Every arch
> which has CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU should have already called idle_task_exit()
> from AP. The only exception is parisc because it switches them to
> &init_mm unconditionally (see smp_boot_one_cpu() and smp_cpu_init()),
> but the patch will still work there because it calls mmgrab(&init_mm) in
> smp_cpu_init() and then should call mmdrop(&init_mm) in finish_cpu().
Thanks for debugging this. How did you hit it in the first place?
A link to the original thread would have helped me:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200113190331.12788-1-cai@lca.pw/
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> -----------------------------
> kernel/workqueue.c:710 RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> Call Trace:
> dump_stack+0xf4/0x164 (unreliable)
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x140/0x164
> get_work_pool+0x110/0x150
> __queue_work+0x1bc/0xca0
> queue_work_on+0x114/0x120
> css_release+0x9c/0xc0
> percpu_ref_put_many+0x204/0x230
> free_pcp_prepare+0x264/0x570
> free_unref_page+0x38/0xf0
> __mmdrop+0x21c/0x2c0
> idle_task_exit+0x170/0x1b0
> pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self+0x38/0x2e0
> cpu_die+0x48/0x64
> arch_cpu_idle_dead+0x30/0x50
> do_idle+0x2f4/0x470
> cpu_startup_entry+0x38/0x40
> start_secondary+0x7a8/0xa80
> start_secondary_resume+0x10/0x14
Do we know when this started happening? ie. can we determine a Fixes
tag?
> <Peter to sign off here>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai at lca.pw>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c | 1 -
> include/linux/sched/mm.h | 2 ++
> kernel/cpu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
> index 13e251699346..b2ba3e95bda7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
> @@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
> /* Standard hot unplug procedure */
>
> idle_task_exit();
> - current->active_mm = NULL; /* for sanity */
If I'm reading it right, we'll now be running with active_mm == init_mm
in the offline loop.
I guess that's fine, I can't think of any reason it would matter, and it
seems like we were NULL'ing it out just for paranoia's sake not because
of any actual problem.
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)
cheers
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> index c49257a3b510..a132d875d351 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
> __mmdrop(mm);
> }
>
> +void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm);
> +
> /*
> * This has to be called after a get_task_mm()/mmget_not_zero()
> * followed by taking the mmap_sem for writing before modifying the
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 2371292f30b0..244d30544377 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
> *
> * This code is licenced under the GPL.
> */
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -564,6 +565,21 @@ static int bringup_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> return bringup_wait_for_ap(cpu);
> }
>
> +static int finish_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *idle = idle_thread_get(cpu);
> + struct mm_struct *mm = idle->active_mm;
> +
> + /*
> + * idle_task_exit() will have switched to &init_mm, now
> + * clean up any remaining active_mm state.
> + */
> + if (mm != &init_mm)
> + idle->active_mm = &init_mm;
> + mmdrop(mm);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Hotplug state machine related functions
> */
> @@ -1549,7 +1565,7 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_hp_states[] = {
> [CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU] = {
> .name = "cpu:bringup",
> .startup.single = bringup_cpu,
> - .teardown.single = NULL,
> + .teardown.single = finish_cpu,
> .cant_stop = true,
> },
> /* Final state before CPU kills itself */
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index a2694ba82874..8787958339d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6200,13 +6200,14 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
> struct mm_struct *mm = current->active_mm;
>
> BUG_ON(cpu_online(smp_processor_id()));
> + BUG_ON(current != this_rq()->idle);
>
> if (mm != &init_mm) {
> switch_mm(mm, &init_mm, current);
> - current->active_mm = &init_mm;
> finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
> }
> - mmdrop(mm);
> +
> + /* finish_cpu(), as ran on the BP, will clean up the active_mm state */
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.21.0 (Apple Git-122.2)
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list