[PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc test_emulate_step: add testcases for divde[.] and divdeu[.] instructions
Balamuruhan S
bala24 at linux.ibm.com
Wed Apr 1 22:21:45 AEDT 2020
On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 16:26 +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Balamuruhan S wrote:
> > add testcases for divde, divde., divdeu, divdeu. emulated
> > instructions to cover few scenarios,
> > * with same dividend and divisor to have undefine RT
> > for divdeu[.]
> > * with divide by zero to have undefine RT for both
> > divde[.] and divdeu[.]
> > * with negative dividend to cover -|divisor| < r <= 0 if
> > the dividend is negative for divde[.]
> > * normal case with proper dividend and divisor for both
> > divde[.] and divdeu[.]
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan at linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24 at linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c | 164
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 164 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
> > b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
> > index 42347067739c..ffeb9b68a31d 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/test_emulate_step.c
> > @@ -53,6 +53,14 @@
> > ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
> > #define TEST_ADDC_DOT(t, a, b) (PPC_INST_ADDC | ___PPC_RT(t) |
> > \
> > ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b) | 0x1)
> > +#define TEST_DIVDE(t, a, b) (PPC_INST_DIVDE | ___PPC_RT(t) | \
> > + ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
> > +#define TEST_DIVDE_DOT(t, a, b) (PPC_INST_DIVDE | ___PPC_RT(t) | \
> > + ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b) | 0x1)
> > +#define TEST_DIVDEU(t, a, b) (PPC_INST_DIVDEU | ___PPC_RT(t) | \
> > + ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b))
> > +#define TEST_DIVDEU_DOT(t, a, b)(PPC_INST_DIVDEU | ___PPC_RT(t) | \
> > + ___PPC_RA(a) | ___PPC_RB(b) | 0x1)
> >
> > #define MAX_SUBTESTS 16
> >
> > @@ -837,6 +845,162 @@ static struct compute_test compute_tests[] = {
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .mnemonic = "divde",
> > + .subtests = {
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MIN",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MIN,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = 1L, RB = 0",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE(20, 21, 22),
> > + .flags = IGNORE_GPR(20),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = 1L,
> > + .gpr[22] = 0,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MAX",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MAX,
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .mnemonic = "divde.",
> > + .subtests = {
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MIN",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE_DOT(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MIN,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = 1L, RB = 0",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE_DOT(20, 21, 22),
> > + .flags = IGNORE_GPR(20),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = 1L,
> > + .gpr[22] = 0,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MAX",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDE_DOT(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MAX,
> > + }
> > + }
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .mnemonic = "divdeu",
> > + .subtests = {
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MIN",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDEU(20, 21, 22),
> > + .flags = IGNORE_GPR(20),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MIN,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = 1L, RB = 0",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDEU(20, 21, 22),
> > + .flags = IGNORE_GPR(20),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = 1L,
> > + .gpr[22] = 0,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN, RB = LONG_MAX",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDEU(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MIN,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MAX,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MAX - 1, RB = LONG_MAX",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDEU_DOT(20, 21, 22),
> > + .regs = {
> > + .gpr[21] = LONG_MAX - 1,
> > + .gpr[22] = LONG_MAX,
> > + }
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .descr = "RA = LONG_MIN + 1, RB = LONG_MIN",
> > + .instr = TEST_DIVDEU_DOT(20, 21, 22),
>
> I think you meant to use TEST_DIVDEU here ^^^^^ and in the test before,
> rather than TEST_DIVDEU_DOT.
yes indeed, I will fix it in my next version.
>
> Apart from them, for this series:
> Acked-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thank you Naveen for reviewing.
-- Bala
>
>
> - Naveen
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list