[PATCH v5 14/31] powernv/fadump: define register/un-register callback functions

Hari Bathini hbathini at linux.ibm.com
Thu Sep 5 19:54:56 AEST 2019



On 05/09/19 12:53 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hari Bathini <hbathini at linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-fadump.c
>> index e466f7e..91fb909 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-fadump.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-fadump.c
>> @@ -52,6 +68,8 @@ static ulong opal_fadump_init_mem_struct(struct fw_dump *fadump_conf)
>>  	opal_fdm->fadumphdr_addr = (opal_fdm->rgn[0].dest +
>>  				    fadump_conf->boot_memory_size);
>>  
>> +	opal_fadump_update_config(fadump_conf, opal_fdm);
>> +
>>  	return addr;
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -97,12 +115,69 @@ static int opal_fadump_setup_metadata(struct fw_dump *fadump_conf)
>>  
>>  static int opal_fadump_register(struct fw_dump *fadump_conf)
>>  {
>> -	return -EIO;
>> +	int i, err = -EIO;
>> +	s64 rc;
> 
> Some compiler versions are warning about this being used uninitialised:
> 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-fadump.c:316:3: error: 'rc' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
> 
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13943984/
> 
> Which does seem like a legitimate warning.

fixed...



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list