[RFC PATCH 1/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Make namespace size validation arch dependent
Dan Williams
dan.j.williams at intel.com
Thu Oct 31 17:30:19 AEDT 2019
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:35 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
[..]
> > True, for the pfn device and the device-dax mapping size, but I'm
> > suggesting adding another instance of alignment control at the raw
> > namespace level. That would need to be disconnected from the
> > device-dax page mapping granularity.
> >
>
> Can you explain what you mean by raw namespace level ? We don't have
> multiple values against which we need to check the alignment of
> namespace start and namespace size.
>
> If you can outline how and where you would like to enforce that check I
> can start working on it.
>
What I mean is that the process of setting up a pfn namespace goes
something like this in shell script form:
1/ echo $size > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/size
2/ echo $namespace > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/namespace
3/ echo $pfn_align > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/align
What I'm suggesting is add an optional 0th step that does:
echo $raw_align > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/align
Where the raw align needs to be needs to be max($pfn_align,
arch_mapping_granulariy).
So on powerpc where PAGE_SIZE < arch_mapping_granulariy, the following:
cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/supported_aligns
...would show the same output as:
cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/align
...but with any alignment choice less than arch_mapping_granulariy removed.
All that said, the x86 vmemmap_populate() falls back to use small
pages in some case to get around this constraint. Can't powerpc do the
same? It would seem to be less work than the above proposal.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list