[RFC PATCH 1/4] libnvdimm/namespace: Make namespace size validation arch dependent

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

Dan Williams <dan.j.williams at intel.com> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:35 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
> <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> [..]
>> > True, for the pfn device and the device-dax mapping size, but I'm
>> > suggesting adding another instance of alignment control at the raw
>> > namespace level. That would need to be disconnected from the
>> > device-dax page mapping granularity.
>> >
>>
>> Can you explain what you mean by raw namespace level ? We don't have
>> multiple values against which we need to check the alignment of
>> namespace start and namespace size.
>>
>> If you can outline how and where you would like to enforce that check I
>> can start working on it.
>>
>
> What I mean is that the process of setting up a pfn namespace goes
> something like this in shell script form:
>
> 1/ echo $size > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/size
> 2/ echo $namespace > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/namespace
> 3/ echo $pfn_align > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/align
>
> What I'm suggesting is add an optional 0th step that does:
>
> echo $raw_align > /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/align
>
> Where the raw align needs to be needs to be max($pfn_align,
> arch_mapping_granulariy).


I started looking at this and was wondering about userspace being aware
of the direct-map mapping size. We can figure that out by parsing kernel
log

[    0.000000] Page orders: linear mapping = 24, virtual = 16, io = 16, vmemmap = 24


But I am not sure we want to do that. There is not set of raw_align
value to select. What we need to make sure is the below.

1) While creating a namespace we need to make sure that namespace size
is multiple of direct-map mapping size. If we ensure that
size is aligned, we should also get the namespace start to be aligned?

2) While initialzing a namespace by scanning label area, we need to make
sure every namespace in the region satisfy the above requirement. If not
we should mark the region disabled. 


>
> So on powerpc where PAGE_SIZE < arch_mapping_granulariy, the following:
>
> cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/$namespace/supported_aligns
>
> ...would show the same output as:
>
> cat /sys/bus/nd/devices/$pfn/align
>
> ...but with any alignment choice less than arch_mapping_granulariy removed.
>

I am not sure why we need to do that. For example: even if we have
direct-map mapping size as PAGE_SIZE (64K), we still should allow an user
mapping with hugepage size (16M)?


-aneesh