[PATCH v2 3/4] Documentation/ABI: mark /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files deprecated

Sourabh Jain sourabhjain at linux.ibm.com
Wed Nov 6 16:29:12 AEDT 2019



On 11/5/19 10:31 PM, Hari Bathini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/11/19 2:24 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/21/19 1:11 PM, Hari Bathini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/10/19 6:35 PM, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>>>> The /sys/kernel/fadump_* sysfs files are replicated under
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +Note: The following FADump sysfs files are deprecated.
>>>> +
>>>> +    Deprecated                       Alternative
>>>> +    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> +    /sys/kernel/fadump_enabled           /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled
>>>> +    /sys/kernel/fadump_registered        /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_registered
>>>> +    /sys/kernel/fadump_release_mem       /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_release_mem
>>>
>>> /sys/kernel/fadump/* looks tidy instead of /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_* 
>>> I mean, /sys/kernel/fadump/fadump_enabled => /sys/kernel/fadump/enabled and such..
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please confirm whether you want to address the sysfs file path differently or
>> actually changing the sysfs file name from fadump_enabled to enabled.
> 
> I meant, given the path "/sys/kernel/fadump/", the prefix fadump_ is redundant.
> If there are no conventions that we should retain the same file name, I suggest
> to drop the fadump_ prefix and just call them enabled, registered, etc..

Oh Yes, I agree with you. It's better not to prefix the sysfs files with fadump_. As we already
have directory that convey the same information.

I did not find any rule regarding renaming an obsolete sysfs file in Documentation/ABI/README.
So lets remove the fadump_ prefix from fadump sysfs file. 

Thanks,
Sourabh Jain



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list