[RESEND PATCH v3 04/11] s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 8:01 AM Laura Abbott <labbott at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/22/19 8:49 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common
> > place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand.
> >
> > If it is enabled for s390, the following error is reported:
> >
> > In file included from arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c:19:
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query':
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints
> >    asm volatile(
> >    ^~~
> > ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
> >
>
> This also seems to still be broken, again with gcc 9.1.1
>
> BUILDSTDERR: In file included from arch/s390/crypto/prng.c:29:
> BUILDSTDERR: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query_func':
> BUILDSTDERR: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints
> BUILDSTDERR:   170 |  asm volatile(
> BUILDSTDERR:       |  ^~~
> BUILDSTDERR: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm'
>
> I realized we're still carrying a patch to add -fno-section-anchors
> but it's a similar failure to powerpc.


Christophe had already pointed out potential issues for "i" constraint,
and I have fixups in hand:

See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/3/459


My plan was to send it after all of my base patches
were merged.

This s390 cparf.h is included in the TODO list.

Will fix soon.

Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada