[PATCH] powerpc/64s: Make boot look nice(r)
Thiago Jung Bauermann
bauerman at linux.ibm.com
Fri May 17 13:18:26 AEST 2019
Hello,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> writes:
> Christophe Leroy's on May 16, 2019 2:47 pm:
>>
>>
>> Le 16/05/2019 à 04:04, Nicholas Piggin a écrit:
>>> Radix boot looks like this:
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> phys_mem_size = 0x200000000
>>> dcache_bsize = 0x80
>>> icache_bsize = 0x80
>>> cpu_features = 0x0000c06f8f5fb1a7
>>> possible = 0x0000fbffcf5fb1a7
>>> always = 0x00000003800081a1
>>> cpu_user_features = 0xdc0065c2 0xaee00000
>>> mmu_features = 0xbc006041
>>> firmware_features = 0x0000000010000000
>>> hash-mmu: ppc64_pft_size = 0x0
>>> hash-mmu: kernel vmalloc start = 0xc008000000000000
>>> hash-mmu: kernel IO start = 0xc00a000000000000
>>> hash-mmu: kernel vmemmap start = 0xc00c000000000000
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Fix:
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>> phys_mem_size = 0x200000000
>>> dcache_bsize = 0x80
>>> icache_bsize = 0x80
>>> cpu_features = 0x0000c06f8f5fb1a7
>>> possible = 0x0000fbffcf5fb1a7
>>> always = 0x00000003800081a1
>>> cpu_user_features = 0xdc0065c2 0xaee00000
>>> mmu_features = 0xbc006041
>>> firmware_features = 0x0000000010000000
>>> vmalloc start = 0xc008000000000000
>>> IO start = 0xc00a000000000000
>>> vmemmap start = 0xc00c000000000000
>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com>
>>
>> I fear your change defeats most of the purpose of commit
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20190515&id=e4dccf9092ab48a6f902003b9558c0e45d0e849a
>
> I think it's still a significant improvement without introducing
> the regression :)
>
>> As far as I understand, the main issue is the "hash-mmu:" prefix ?
>> That's due to the following define in top of book3s64/hash_utils.c:
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "hash-mmu: " fmt
>>
>> Could we simply undef it just before print_system_hash_info() ?
>
> Little bit fragile I think.
>
>> Or move print_system_hash_info() in another book3s64 specific file which
>> doesn't set pr_fmt ?
>
> print_system_info() would be okay for me and allow getting rid of
> that PPC64 config. Although it also needs to go in a file without
> pr_fmt I guess that's not so hard.
Or it could use printk(KERN_INFO "...") instead of pr_info(), which I
think makes sense if the pr_fmt prefix is undesired.
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list