[PATCH v10 09/12] ima: Implement support for module-style appended signatures
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Tue May 14 22:09:25 AEST 2019
Hi Thiago,
On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 00:51 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
>
> @@ -326,6 +356,10 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
> case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN:
> break;
> case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS: /* No EVM protected xattrs. */
> + /* It's fine not to have xattrs when using a modsig. */
> + if (try_modsig)
> + break;
> + /* fall through */
> case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL: /* No security.evm xattr. */
> cause = "missing-HMAC";
> goto out;
> @@ -340,6 +374,14 @@ int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func,
> rc = xattr_verify(func, iint, xattr_value, xattr_len, &status,
> &cause);
>
> + /*
> + * If we have a modsig and either no imasig or the imasig's key isn't
> + * known, then try verifying the modsig.
> + */
> + if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS && try_modsig &&
> + (!xattr_value || rc == -ENOKEY))
> + rc = modsig_verify(func, modsig, &status, &cause);
EVM protects other security xattrs, not just security.ima, if they
exist. As a result, evm_verifyxattr() could pass based on the other
security xattrs.
Mimi
> +
> out:
> /*
> * File signatures on some filesystems can not be properly verified.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list