[PATCH V5 0/5] NestMMU pte upgrade workaround for mprotect

Andrew Morton akpm at linux-foundation.org
Fri Mar 1 06:39:45 AEDT 2019

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:28:43 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org> writes:
> > [patch 1/5]: unreviewed and has unaddressed comments from mpe.
> > [patch 2/5]: ditto
> > [patch 3/5]: ditto
> > [patch 4/5]: seems ready
> > [patch 5/5]: reviewed by mpe, but appears to need more work
> That was mostly variable naming preferences. I like the christmas
> tree style not the inverted christmas tree. There is one detail about
> commit message, which indicate the change may be required by other
> architecture too. Was not sure whether that needed a commit message
> update.
> I didn't send an updated series because after replying to most of them I
> didn't find a strong request to get the required changes in. If you want
> me update the series with this variable name ordering and commit message
> update I can send a new series today.

OK, minor stuff.

The patches have been in -next for a month, which is good but we really
should get some review of the first three.

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list