[PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc/papr_scm: Force a scm-unbind if initial scm-bind fails
Oliver O'Halloran
oohall at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 13:39:18 AEST 2019
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:58 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall at gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> > + rc = drc_pmem_bind(p);
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > if (rc)
> >> > goto err;
> >> >
> >>
> >> I am also not sure about the module reference count here. Should we
> >> increment the module reference count after a bind so that we can track
> >> failures in ubind and fail the module unload?
> >
> > I don't really get what you're concerned about here. The error
> > handling path calls drc_pmem_unbind() so if there's a bind error we
> > should never leave probe with memory still bound.
> >
>
> In the remove callback, if the ubind fail should we allow the module
> unload?
If the drc_pmem_unbind() in the driver's remove function fails the
driver will still be unbound from the platform device for that DRC.
You can try re-bind the driver to the platform device and it'll hit
the unbind-then-bind again error path this series introduces (which
might also fail), but that's fine. The only reasons I can think of for
drc_pmem_unbind() failing are bugs in the hypervisor or bugs in the
driver. Forcing the module to stay loaded doesn't help either case so
I'm not seeing the benefit.
Oliver
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list