[PATCH] powerpc: Use nid as fallback for chip_id
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Mon Jul 29 22:41:55 AEST 2019
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> One of the uses of chip_id is to find out all cores that are part of the same
> chip. However ibm,chip_id property is not present in device-tree of PowerVM
> Lpars. Hence lscpu output shows one core per socket and multiple cores.
>
> Before the patch.
> # lscpu
> Architecture: ppc64le
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 128
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-127
> Thread(s) per core: 8
> Core(s) per socket: 1
> Socket(s): 16
> NUMA node(s): 2
> Model: 2.2 (pvr 004e 0202)
> Model name: POWER9 (architected), altivec supported
> Hypervisor vendor: pHyp
> Virtualization type: para
> L1d cache: 32K
> L1i cache: 32K
> L2 cache: 512K
> L3 cache: 10240K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-63
> NUMA node1 CPU(s): 64-127
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/physical_package_id
> -1
>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> index 7159e791a70d..0b8918b43580 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
> @@ -867,18 +867,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_ibm_chip_id);
> * @cpu: The logical cpu number.
> *
> * Return the value of the ibm,chip-id property corresponding to the given
> - * logical cpu number. If the chip-id can not be found, returns -1.
> + * logical cpu number. If the chip-id can not be found, return nid.
> + *
> */
> int cpu_to_chip_id(int cpu)
> {
> struct device_node *np;
> + int chip_id = -1;
>
> np = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
> if (!np)
> return -1;
>
> + chip_id = of_get_ibm_chip_id(np);
> + if (chip_id == -1)
> + chip_id = of_node_to_nid(np);
> +
> of_node_put(np);
> - return of_get_ibm_chip_id(np);
> + return chip_id;
> }
A nid is not a chip-id.
This obviously happens to work for the case you've identified above but
it's not something I'm happy to merge in general.
We could do a similar change in the topology code, but I'd probably like
it to be restricted to when we're running under PowerVM and there are no
chip-ids found at all.
I'm also not clear how it will interact with migration.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list