[PATCH] powerpc/xive: Fix loop exit-condition in xive_find_target_in_mask()
Michael Ellerman
patch-notifications at ellerman.id.au
Mon Jul 22 12:48:14 AEST 2019
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 10:35:24 UTC, "Gautham R. Shenoy" wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> xive_find_target_in_mask() has the following for(;;) loop which has a
> bug when @first == cpumask_first(@mask) and condition 1 fails to hold
> for every CPU in @mask. In this case we loop forever in the for-loop.
>
> first = cpu;
> for (;;) {
> if (cpu_online(cpu) && xive_try_pick_target(cpu)) // condition 1
> return cpu;
> cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, mask);
> if (cpu == first) // condition 2
> break;
>
> if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) // condition 3
> cpu = cpumask_first(mask);
> }
>
> This is because, when @first == cpumask_first(@mask), we never hit the
> condition 2 (cpu == first) since prior to this check, we would have
> executed "cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, mask)" which will set the value of
> @cpu to a value greater than @first or to nr_cpus_ids. When this is
> coupled with the fact that condition 1 is not met, we will never exit
> this loop.
>
> This was discovered by the hard-lockup detector while running LTP test
> concurrently with SMT switch tests.
>
> watchdog: CPU 12 detected hard LOCKUP on other CPUs 68
> watchdog: CPU 12 TB:85587019220796, last SMP heartbeat TB:85578827223399 (15999ms ago)
> watchdog: CPU 68 Hard LOCKUP
> watchdog: CPU 68 TB:85587019361273, last heartbeat TB:85576815065016 (19930ms ago)
> CPU: 68 PID: 45050 Comm: hxediag Kdump: loaded Not tainted 4.18.0-100.el8.ppc64le #1
> NIP: c0000000006f5578 LR: c000000000cba9ec CTR: 0000000000000000
> REGS: c000201fff3c7d80 TRAP: 0100 Not tainted (4.18.0-100.el8.ppc64le)
> MSR: 9000000002883033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24028424 XER: 00000000
> CFAR: c0000000006f558c IRQMASK: 1
> GPR00: c0000000000afc58 c000201c01c43400 c0000000015ce500 c000201cae26ec18
> GPR04: 0000000000000800 0000000000000540 0000000000000800 00000000000000f8
> GPR08: 0000000000000020 00000000000000a8 0000000080000000 c00800001a1beed8
> GPR12: c0000000000b1410 c000201fff7f4c00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000540 0000000000000001
> GPR20: 0000000000000048 0000000010110000 c00800001a1e3780 c000201cae26ed18
> GPR24: 0000000000000000 c000201cae26ed8c 0000000000000001 c000000001116bc0
> GPR28: c000000001601ee8 c000000001602494 c000201cae26ec18 000000000000001f
> NIP [c0000000006f5578] find_next_bit+0x38/0x90
> LR [c000000000cba9ec] cpumask_next+0x2c/0x50
> Call Trace:
> [c000201c01c43400] [c000201cae26ec18] 0xc000201cae26ec18 (unreliable)
> [c000201c01c43420] [c0000000000afc58] xive_find_target_in_mask+0x1b8/0x240
> [c000201c01c43470] [c0000000000b0228] xive_pick_irq_target.isra.3+0x168/0x1f0
> [c000201c01c435c0] [c0000000000b1470] xive_irq_startup+0x60/0x260
> [c000201c01c43640] [c0000000001d8328] __irq_startup+0x58/0xf0
> [c000201c01c43670] [c0000000001d844c] irq_startup+0x8c/0x1a0
> [c000201c01c436b0] [c0000000001d57b0] __setup_irq+0x9f0/0xa90
> [c000201c01c43760] [c0000000001d5aa0] request_threaded_irq+0x140/0x220
> [c000201c01c437d0] [c00800001a17b3d4] bnx2x_nic_load+0x188c/0x3040 [bnx2x]
> [c000201c01c43950] [c00800001a187c44] bnx2x_self_test+0x1fc/0x1f70 [bnx2x]
> [c000201c01c43a90] [c000000000adc748] dev_ethtool+0x11d8/0x2cb0
> [c000201c01c43b60] [c000000000b0b61c] dev_ioctl+0x5ac/0xa50
> [c000201c01c43bf0] [c000000000a8d4ec] sock_do_ioctl+0xbc/0x1b0
> [c000201c01c43c60] [c000000000a8dfb8] sock_ioctl+0x258/0x4f0
> [c000201c01c43d20] [c0000000004c9704] do_vfs_ioctl+0xd4/0xa70
> [c000201c01c43de0] [c0000000004ca274] sys_ioctl+0xc4/0x160
> [c000201c01c43e30] [c00000000000b388] system_call+0x5c/0x70
> Instruction dump:
> 78aad182 54a806be 3920ffff 78a50664 794a1f24 7d294036 7d43502a 7d295039
> 4182001c 48000034 78a9d182 79291f24 <7d23482a> 2fa90000 409e0020 38a50040
>
> To fix this, move the check for condition 2 after the check for
> condition 3, so that we are able to break out of the loop soon after
> iterating through all the CPUs in the @mask in the problem case. Use
> do..while() to achieve this.
>
> Fixes: 243e25112d06 ("powerpc/xive: Native exploitation of the XIVE
> interrupt controller")
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org> # 4.12+
> Reported-by: Indira P. Joga <indira.priya at in.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/4d202c8c8ed3822327285747db1765967110b274
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list