[PATCH v3 6/6] s390/mm: Remove sev_active() function
Halil Pasic
pasic at linux.ibm.com
Thu Jul 18 23:01:23 AEST 2019
On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:44:56 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote:
> > -/* are we a protected virtualization guest? */
> > -bool sev_active(void)
> > -{
> > - return is_prot_virt_guest();
> > -}
> > -
> > bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - return sev_active();
> > + return is_prot_virt_guest();
> > }
>
> Do we want to keep the comment for force_dma_unencrypted?
Yes we do. With the comment transferred:
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com>
>
> Otherwise looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list