[PATCH v4 7/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Enter a secure guest

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Jul 11 22:57:37 AEST 2019


Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio at linux.ibm.com> writes:
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> To enter a secure guest, we have to go through the ultravisor, therefore
> we do a ucall when we are entering a secure guest.
>
> This change is needed for any sort of entry to the secure guest from the
> hypervisor, whether it is a return from an hcall, a return from a
> hypervisor interrupt, or the first time that a secure guest vCPU is run.
>
> If we are returning from an hcall, the results are already in the
> appropriate registers R3:12, except for R3, R6 and R7. R3 has the status
> of the reflected hcall, therefore we move it to R0 for the ultravisor and
> set R3 to the UV_RETURN ucall number. R6,7 were used as temporary
> registers, hence we restore them.

This is another case where some documentation would help people to
review the code.

> Have fast_guest_return check the kvm_arch.secure_guest field so that a
> new CPU enters UV when started (in response to a RTAS start-cpu call).
>
> Thanks to input from Paul Mackerras, Ram Pai and Mike Anderson.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [ Pass SRR1 in r11 for UV_RETURN, fix kvmppc_msr_interrupt to preserve
>   the MSR_S bit ]
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus at ozlabs.org>
> [ Fix UV_RETURN ucall number and arch.secure_guest check ]
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram at us.ibm.com>
> [ Save the actual R3 in R0 for the ultravisor and use R3 for the
>   UV_RETURN ucall number. Update commit message and ret_to_ultra comment ]
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio at linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h       |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/ultravisor-api.h |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c         |  1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S   | 40 +++++++++++++++++++----
>  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> index cffb365d9d02..89813ca987c2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <asm/asm-compat.h>
>  #include <asm/feature-fixups.h>
>  #include <asm/cpuidle.h>
> +#include <asm/ultravisor-api.h>
>  
>  /* Sign-extend HDEC if not on POWER9 */
>  #define EXTEND_HDEC(reg)			\
> @@ -1092,16 +1093,12 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>  END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_HAS_PPR)
>  
>  	ld	r5, VCPU_LR(r4)
> -	ld	r6, VCPU_CR(r4)
>  	mtlr	r5
> -	mtcr	r6
>  
>  	ld	r1, VCPU_GPR(R1)(r4)
>  	ld	r2, VCPU_GPR(R2)(r4)
>  	ld	r3, VCPU_GPR(R3)(r4)
>  	ld	r5, VCPU_GPR(R5)(r4)
> -	ld	r6, VCPU_GPR(R6)(r4)
> -	ld	r7, VCPU_GPR(R7)(r4)
>  	ld	r8, VCPU_GPR(R8)(r4)
>  	ld	r9, VCPU_GPR(R9)(r4)
>  	ld	r10, VCPU_GPR(R10)(r4)
> @@ -1119,10 +1116,38 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
>  	mtspr	SPRN_HDSISR, r0
>  END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)
>  
> +	ld	r6, VCPU_KVM(r4)
> +	lbz	r7, KVM_SECURE_GUEST(r6)
> +	cmpdi	r7, 0

You could hoist the load of r6 and r7 to here?

> +	bne	ret_to_ultra
> +
> +	lwz	r6, VCPU_CR(r4)
> +	mtcr	r6
> +
> +	ld	r7, VCPU_GPR(R7)(r4)
> +	ld	r6, VCPU_GPR(R6)(r4)
>  	ld	r0, VCPU_GPR(R0)(r4)
>  	ld	r4, VCPU_GPR(R4)(r4)
>  	HRFI_TO_GUEST
>  	b	.
> +/*
> + * We are entering a secure guest, so we have to invoke the ultravisor to do
> + * that. If we are returning from a hcall, the results are already in the
> + * appropriate registers R3:12, except for R3, R6 and R7. R3 has the status of
> + * the reflected hcall, therefore we move it to R0 for the ultravisor and set
> + * R3 to the UV_RETURN ucall number. R6,7 were used as temporary registers
> + * above, hence we restore them.
> + */
> +ret_to_ultra:
> +	lwz	r6, VCPU_CR(r4)
> +	mtcr	r6
> +	mfspr	r11, SPRN_SRR1
> +	mr	r0, r3
> +	LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r3, UV_RETURN)

Worth open coding to save three instructions?

> +	ld	r7, VCPU_GPR(R7)(r4)
> +	ld	r6, VCPU_GPR(R6)(r4)
> +	ld	r4, VCPU_GPR(R4)(r4)
> +	sc	2
>  
>  /*
>   * Enter the guest on a P9 or later system where we have exactly
> @@ -3318,13 +3343,16 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(MMU_FTR_TYPE_RADIX)
>   *   r0 is used as a scratch register
>   */
>  kvmppc_msr_interrupt:
> +	andis.	r0, r11, MSR_S at h
>  	rldicl	r0, r11, 64 - MSR_TS_S_LG, 62
> -	cmpwi	r0, 2 /* Check if we are in transactional state..  */
> +	cmpwi	cr1, r0, 2 /* Check if we are in transactional state..  */
>  	ld	r11, VCPU_INTR_MSR(r9)
> -	bne	1f
> +	bne	cr1, 1f
>  	/* ... if transactional, change to suspended */
>  	li	r0, 1
>  1:	rldimi	r11, r0, MSR_TS_S_LG, 63 - MSR_TS_T_LG
> +	beqlr
> +	oris	r11, r11, MSR_S at h		/* preserve MSR_S bit setting */
>  	blr

I don't see this part mentioned in the change log?

It's also pretty subtle, a comment might be helpful.

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list