[PATCH v2] tpm: tpm_ibm_vtpm: Fix unallocated banks
Mimi Zohar
zohar at linux.ibm.com
Tue Jul 9 08:24:04 AEST 2019
Hi Jarkko,
On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 18:11 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-07-06 at 20:18 -0400, Nayna Jain wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * tpm_get_pcr_allocation() - initialize the chip allocated banks for PCRs
> > + * @chip: TPM chip to use.
> > + */
> > +static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > + rc = tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> > + else
> > + rc = tpm1_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
>
> It is just a trivial static function, which means that kdoc comment is
> not required and neither it is useful. Please remove that. I would
> rewrite the function like:
>
> static int tpm_get_pcr_allocation(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> {
> int rc;
>
> rc = (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ?
> tpm2_get_pcr_allocation(chip) :
> tpm1_get_pcr_allocation(chip);
>
> return rc > 0 ? -ENODEV : rc;
> }
>
> This addresses the issue that Stefan also pointed out. You have to
> deal with the TPM error codes.
Hm, in the past I was told by Christoph not to use the ternary
operator. Have things changed? Other than removing the comment, the
only other difference is the return.
Mimi
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list