[v4 5/6] powerpc: add machine check safe copy_to_user
Christophe Leroy
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Sat Jul 6 20:17:45 AEST 2019
Le 06/07/2019 à 11:46, Santosh Sivaraj a écrit :
> Use memcpy_mcsafe() implementation to define copy_to_user_mcsafe()
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh at fossix.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 8c1c636308c8..a173b392c272 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if ((PPC_BOOK3S_64 || PPC32) && !RELOCATABLE && !HIBERNATION)
> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if PPC64
> + select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_MCSAFE if PPC64
> select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> select ARCH_HAS_ZONE_DEVICE if PPC_BOOK3S_64
> select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 76f34346b642..8899864a5552 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -386,6 +386,20 @@ static inline unsigned long raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline unsigned long __must_check
> +copy_to_user_mcsafe(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +{
> + if (likely(check_copy_size(from, n, true))) {
> + if (access_ok(to, n)) {
After looking once more, it looks like copy_to_user_mcsafe() is only
called from copyout_mcsafe(), so maybe this access_ok() check is
superfluous.
> + allow_write_to_user(to, n);
> + n = memcpy_mcsafe((void *)to, from, n);
> + prevent_write_to_user(to, n);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return n;
Shouldn't it return 0 when check_copy_size() fails ?
Christophe
> +}
> +
> extern unsigned long __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size);
>
> static inline unsigned long clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list