[PATCH 03/19] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: check the IRQ controller type

[Paul Mackerras]

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 07:43:15PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> We will have different KVM devices for interrupts, one for the
> XICS-over-XIVE mode and one for the XIVE native exploitation
> mode. Let's add some checks to make sure we are not mixing the
> interfaces in KVM.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg at kaod.org>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
> index f78d002f0fe0..8a4fa45f07f8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c
> @@ -819,6 +819,9 @@ u64 kvmppc_xive_get_icp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvmppc_xive_vcpu *xc = vcpu->arch.xive_vcpu;
>  
> +	if (!kvmppc_xics_enabled(vcpu))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
>  	if (!xc)
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -835,6 +838,9 @@ int kvmppc_xive_set_icp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 icpval)
>  	u8 cppr, mfrr;
>  	u32 xisr;
>  
> +	if (!kvmppc_xics_enabled(vcpu))
> +		return -EPERM;
> +
>  	if (!xc || !xive)
>  		return -ENOENT;

I can't see how these new checks could ever trigger in the code as it
stands.  Is there a way at present?  Do following patches ever add a
path where the new checks could trigger, or is this just an excess of
caution?  (Your patch description should ideally have answered these
questions for me.)

Paul.