[PATCH v2 1/3] powerpc: Stop using pr_cont() in __die()
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Jan 10 22:57:35 AEDT 2019
Using pr_cont() risks having our output interleaved with other output
from other CPUs. Instead print everything in a single printk() call.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
v2: Use a single printk with (mostly) compile time checks rather than
constructing the string with seq_buf.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 64936b60d521..164fc92895be 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -257,24 +257,14 @@ static int __die(const char *str, struct pt_regs *regs, long err)
{
printk("Oops: %s, sig: %ld [#%d]\n", str, err, ++die_counter);
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN))
- printk("LE ");
- else
- printk("BE ");
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
- pr_cont("PREEMPT ");
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
- pr_cont("SMP NR_CPUS=%d ", NR_CPUS);
-
- if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
- pr_cont("DEBUG_PAGEALLOC ");
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
- pr_cont("NUMA ");
-
- pr_cont("%s\n", ppc_md.name ? ppc_md.name : "");
+ printk("%s %s%s%s%s%s %s\n",
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN) ? "LE" : "BE",
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) ? " PREEMPT" : "",
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? " SMP" : "",
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) ? (" NR_CPUS=" __stringify(NR_CPUS)) : "",
+ debug_pagealloc_enabled() ? " DEBUG_PAGEALLOC" : "",
+ IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) ? " NUMA" : "",
+ ppc_md.name ? ppc_md.name : "");
if (notify_die(DIE_OOPS, str, regs, err, 255, SIGSEGV) == NOTIFY_STOP)
return 1;
--
2.20.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list