[PATCH] jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig

[Michael Ellerman]

Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> writes:

> Currently, CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL just means "I _want_ to use jump label".
>
> The jump label is controlled by HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, which is defined
> like this:
>
>   #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
>   # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>   #endif
>
> We can improve this by testing 'asm goto' support in Kconfig, then
> make JUMP_LABEL depend on CC_HAS_ASM_GOTO.
>
> Ugly #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL will go away, and CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL will
> match to the real kernel capability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> ---
>
> This is a trivial conversion from the build system PoV.
> I want to queue this up to kbuild tree.
>
>
>  Makefile                                          |  7 -------
>  arch/Kconfig                                      |  1 +
>  arch/arm/kernel/jump_label.c                      |  4 ----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/jump_label.c                    |  4 ----
>  arch/mips/kernel/jump_label.c                     |  4 ----
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h         |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/jump_label.c                  |  2 --
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-tracepoints.c |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S    |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hvCall.S           |  4 ++--
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/lpar.c             |  2 +-

Looks OK to me.

If there's any odd build errors they should get caught in linux-next.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)

cheers