[kernel, v2] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Fix locked_vm counting for memory used by IOMMU tables

[Michael Ellerman]

On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 03:38:18 UTC, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> We store 2 multilevel tables in iommu_table - one for the hardware and
> one with the corresponding userspace addresses. Before allocating
> the tables, the iommu_table_group_ops::get_table_size() hook returns
> the combined size of the two and VFIO SPAPR TCE IOMMU driver adjusts
> the locked_vm counter correctly. When the table is actually allocated,
> the amount of allocated memory is stored in iommu_table::it_allocated_size
> and used to decrement the locked_vm counter when we release the memory
> used by the table; .get_table_size() and .create_table() calculate it
> independently but the result is expected to be the same.
> 
> However the allocator does not add the userspace table size to
> .it_allocated_size so when we destroy the table because of VFIO PCI
> unplug (i.e. VFIO container is gone but the userspace keeps running),
> we decrement locked_vm by just a half of size of memory we are releasing.
> 
> To make things worse, since we enabled on-demain allocation of
> indirect levels, it_allocated_size contains only the amount of memory
> actually allocated at the table creation time which can just be
> a fraction. It is not a problem with incrementing locked_vm (as
> get_table_size() value is used) but it is with decrementing.
> 
> As the result, we leak locked_vm and may not be able to allocate more
> IOMMU tables after few iterations of hotplug/unplug.
> 
> This sets it_allocated_size in the pnv_pci_ioda2_ops::create_table()
> hook to what pnv_pci_ioda2_get_table_size() returns so from now on
> we have a single place which calculates the maximum memory a table can
> occupy. The original meaning of it_allocated_size is somewhat lost now
> though.
> 
> We do not ditch it_allocated_size whatsoever here and we do not call
> get_table_size() from vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c when decrementing locked_vm
> as we may have multiple IOMMU groups per container and even though they
> all are supposed to have the same get_table_size() implementation,
> there is a small chance for failure or confusion.
> 
> Fixes: 090bad39b "powerpc/powernv: Add indirect levels to it_userspace"
> Fixes: a68bd1267 "powerpc/powernv/ioda: Allocate indirect TCE levels on demand"
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik at ozlabs.ru>
> Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david at gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/11f5acce2fa43b015a8120fa7620fa4e

cheers