BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds

Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google.com
Thu Feb 28 00:07:26 AEDT 2019


On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:35 PM Christophe Leroy
<christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 02/27/2019 08:34 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:25 AM Christophe Leroy
> > <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> With version v8 of the series implementing KASAN on 32 bits powerpc
> >> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=94309),
> >> I'm now able to activate KASAN on a mac99 is QEMU.
> >>
> >> Then I get the following reports at startup. Which of the two reports I
> >> get seems to depend on the option used to build the kernel, but for a
> >> given kernel I always get the same report.
> >>
> >> Is that a real bug, in which case how could I spot it ? Or is it
> >> something wrong in my implementation of KASAN ?
> >
> > What is the state of your source tree?
> > Please pass output through some symbolization script, function offsets
> > are not too useful.
> > There was some in scripts/ dir IIRC, but here is another one (though,
> > never tested on powerpc):
> > https://github.com/google/sanitizers/blob/master/address-sanitizer/tools/kasan_symbolize.py
>
> I get the following. It doesn't seem much interesting, does it ?


Yes, it does not seem to work for powerpc32.
Then please pass addresses through addr2line -fi.



> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in[<        none        >]
> memchr+0x24/0x74 lib/string.c:958
> Read of size 1 at addr c0ecdd40 by task swapper/0
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1142
> Call Trace:
> [c0e9dca0] [c01c42c0] print_address_description+0x64/0x2bc (unreliable)
> [c0e9dcd0] [c01c46a4] kasan_report+0xfc/0x180
> [c0e9dd10] [c0895150] memchr+0x24/0x74
> [c0e9dd30] [c00a9e58] msg_print_text+0x124/0x574
> [c0e9dde0] [c00ab730] console_unlock+0x114/0x4f8
> [c0e9de40] [c00adc80] vprintk_emit+0x188/0x1c4
> [c0e9de80] [c00ae3e4] printk+0xa8/0xcc
> [c0e9df20] [c0c27e44] early_irq_init+0x38/0x108
> [c0e9df50] [c0c15434] start_kernel+0x310/0x488
> [c0e9dff0] [00003484] 0x3484
>
> The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> [<        none        >] __log_buf+0xec0/0x4020
> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.S:?
> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> page:c6eac9a0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0
> flags: 0x1000(reserved)
> raw: 00001000 c6eac9a4 c6eac9a4 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> Memory state around the buggy address:
>   c0ecdc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>   c0ecdc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>  >c0ecdd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00
>                                     ^
>   c0ecdd80: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>   c0ecde00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> ==================================================================
>
>
> Christophe
>
> >
> >
> >
> >> I checked that after kasan_init(), the entire shadow memory is full of 0
> >> only.
> >>
> >> I also made a try with the strong STACK_PROTECTOR compiled in, but no
> >> difference and nothing detected by the stack protector.
> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memchr+0x24/0x74
> >> Read of size 1 at addr c0ecdd40 by task swapper/0
> >>
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1133
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [c0e9dca0] [c01c42a0] print_address_description+0x64/0x2bc (unreliable)
> >> [c0e9dcd0] [c01c4684] kasan_report+0xfc/0x180
> >> [c0e9dd10] [c089579c] memchr+0x24/0x74
> >> [c0e9dd30] [c00a9e38] msg_print_text+0x124/0x574
> >> [c0e9dde0] [c00ab710] console_unlock+0x114/0x4f8
> >> [c0e9de40] [c00adc60] vprintk_emit+0x188/0x1c4
> >> --- interrupt: c0e9df00 at 0x400f330
> >>       LR = init_stack+0x1f00/0x2000
> >> [c0e9de80] [c00ae3c4] printk+0xa8/0xcc (unreliable)
> >> [c0e9df20] [c0c28e44] early_irq_init+0x38/0x108
> >> [c0e9df50] [c0c16434] start_kernel+0x310/0x488
> >> [c0e9dff0] [00003484] 0x3484
> >>
> >> The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> >>    __log_buf+0xec0/0x4020
> >> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> >> page:c6eac9a0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0
> >> flags: 0x1000(reserved)
> >> raw: 00001000 c6eac9a4 c6eac9a4 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001
> >> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> >>
> >> Memory state around the buggy address:
> >>    c0ecdc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    c0ecdc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>   >c0ecdd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00
> >>                                      ^
> >>    c0ecdd80: f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    c0ecde00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> ==================================================================
> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in pmac_nvram_init+0x1ec/0x600
> >> Read of size 1 at addr f6f37de0 by task swapper/0
> >>
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1134
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [c0ff7d60] [c01fe808] print_address_description+0x6c/0x2b0 (unreliable)
> >> [c0ff7d90] [c01fe4fc] kasan_report+0x13c/0x1ac
> >> [c0ff7dd0] [c0d34324] pmac_nvram_init+0x1ec/0x600
> >> [c0ff7ef0] [c0d31148] pmac_setup_arch+0x280/0x308
> >> [c0ff7f20] [c0d2c30c] setup_arch+0x250/0x280
> >> [c0ff7f50] [c0d26354] start_kernel+0xb8/0x4d8
> >> [c0ff7ff0] [00003484] 0x3484
> >>
> >>
> >> Memory state around the buggy address:
> >>    f6f37c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    f6f37d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>   >f6f37d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
> >>                                                  ^
> >>    f6f37e00: 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2
> >>    f6f37e80: 00 00 01 f2 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> ==================================================================
> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in memchr+0xa0/0xac
> >> Read of size 1 at addr c17cdd30 by task swapper/0
> >>
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1135
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [c179dc90] [c032fe28] print_address_description+0x64/0x2bc (unreliable)
> >> [c179dcc0] [c033020c] kasan_report+0xfc/0x180
> >> [c179dd00] [c115ef50] memchr+0xa0/0xac
> >> [c179dd20] [c01297f8] msg_print_text+0xc8/0x67c
> >> [c179ddd0] [c012bc8c] console_unlock+0x17c/0x818
> >> [c179de40] [c012f420] vprintk_emit+0x188/0x1c4
> >> --- interrupt: c179df30 at 0x400def0
> >>       LR = init_stack+0x1ef0/0x2000
> >> [c179de80] [c012fff0] printk+0xa8/0xcc (unreliable)
> >> [c179df20] [c150b4b8] early_irq_init+0x38/0x108
> >> [c179df50] [c14ef7f8] start_kernel+0x30c/0x530
> >> [c179dff0] [00003484] 0x3484
> >>
> >> The buggy address belongs to the variable:
> >>    __log_buf+0xeb0/0x4020
> >> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> >> page:c6ebe9a0 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0
> >> flags: 0x1000(reserved)
> >> raw: 00001000 c6ebe9a4 c6ebe9a4 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000001
> >> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> >>
> >> Memory state around the buggy address:
> >>    c17cdc00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    c17cdc80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>   >c17cdd00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 f3 f3
> >>                                ^
> >>    c17cdd80: f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    c17cde00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> ==================================================================
> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in pmac_nvram_init+0x228/0xae0
> >> Read of size 1 at addr f6f37dd0 by task swapper/0
> >>
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1136
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [c1c37d50] [c03f7e88] print_address_description+0x6c/0x2b0 (unreliable)
> >> [c1c37d80] [c03f7bd4] kasan_report+0x10c/0x16c
> >> [c1c37dc0] [c19879b4] pmac_nvram_init+0x228/0xae0
> >> [c1c37ef0] [c19826bc] pmac_setup_arch+0x578/0x6a8
> >> [c1c37f20] [c19792bc] setup_arch+0x5f4/0x620
> >> [c1c37f50] [c196f898] start_kernel+0xb8/0x588
> >> [c1c37ff0] [00003484] 0x3484
> >>
> >>
> >> Memory state around the buggy address:
> >>    f6f37c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    f6f37d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>   >f6f37d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00
> >>                                            ^
> >>    f6f37e00: 01 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00
> >>    f6f37e80: 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> ==================================================================
> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in pmac_nvram_init+0x1ec/0x5ec
> >> Read of size 1 at addr f6f37de0 by task swapper/0
> >>
> >> CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.0.0-rc7+ #1137
> >> Call Trace:
> >> [c0fb7d60] [c01f8184] print_address_description+0x6c/0x2b0 (unreliable)
> >> [c0fb7d90] [c01f7ed0] kasan_report+0x10c/0x16c
> >> [c0fb7dd0] [c0d1dfe8] pmac_nvram_init+0x1ec/0x5ec
> >> [c0fb7ef0] [c0d1ae90] pmac_setup_arch+0x280/0x308
> >> [c0fb7f20] [c0d16138] setup_arch+0x250/0x280
> >> [c0fb7f50] [c0d1032c] start_kernel+0xb8/0x4a4
> >> [c0fb7ff0] [00003484] 0x3484
> >>
> >>
> >> Memory state around the buggy address:
> >>    f6f37c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>    f6f37d00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >>   >f6f37d80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
> >>                                                  ^
> >>    f6f37e00: 00 00 01 f2 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2
> >>    f6f37e80: 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> ==================================================================
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Christophe


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list