[PATCH-tip 15/22] locking/rwsem: Merge owner into count on x86-64

[Waiman Long]

On 02/07/2019 03:54 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 02/07/2019 03:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:07:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> On 32-bit architectures, there aren't enough bits to hold both.
>>> 64-bit architectures, however, can have enough bits to do that. For
>>> x86-64, the physical address can use up to 52 bits. That is 4PB of
>>> memory. That leaves 12 bits available for other use. The task structure
>>> pointer is also aligned to the L1 cache size. That means another 6 bits
>>> (64 bytes cacheline) will be available. Reserving 2 bits for status
>>> flags, we will have 16 bits for the reader count.  That can supports
>>> up to (64k-1) readers.
>> 64k readers sounds like a number that is fairly 'easy' to reach, esp. on
>> 64bit. These are preemptible locks after all, all we need to do is get
>> 64k tasks nested on enough CPUs.
>>
>> I'm sure there's some willing Java proglet around that spawns more than
>> 64k threads just because it can. Run it on a big enough machine (ISTR
>> there's a number of >1k CPU systems out there) and voila.
> Yes, that can be a problem.
>
> One possible solution is to check if the count goes negative. If so,
> fail the read lock and make the readers wait in the wait queue until the
> count is in positive territory. That effectively reduces the reader
> count to 15 bits, but it will avoid the overflow situation. I will try
> to add that support into the next version.
>
> Cheers,
> Longman

Something like the attached patch.

Cheers,
Longman
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0023-locking-rwsem-Make-MSbit-of-count-as-guard-bit-to-fa.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20190208/fa60dd11/attachment-0001.bin>