[PATCH] powerpc/44x: Force PCI on for CURRITUCK

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Fri Feb 8 22:46:40 AEDT 2019


Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:49 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> The recent rework of PCI kconfig symbols exposed an existing bug in
>> the CURRITUCK kconfig logic.
>>
>> It selects PPC4xx_PCI_EXPRESS which depends on PCI, but PCI is user
>> selectable and might be disabled, leading to a warning:
>>
>>   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PPC4xx_PCI_EXPRESS
>>     Depends on [n]: PCI [=n] && 4xx [=y]
>>     Selected by [y]:
>>     - CURRITUCK [=y] && PPC_47x [=y]
>>
>> Prior to commit eb01d42a7778 ("PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in
>> drivers/pci") PCI was enabled by default for currituck_defconfig so we
>> didn't see the warning. The bad logic was still there, it just
>> required someone disabling PCI in their .config to hit it.
>>
>> Fix it by forcing PCI on for CURRITUCK, which seems was always the
>> expectation anyway.
>>
>> Fixes: eb01d42a7778 ("PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci")
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe at ellerman.id.au>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
>> index 4a9a72d01c3c..35be81fd2dc2 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/Kconfig
>> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ config CURRITUCK
>>         depends on PPC_47x
>>         select SWIOTLB
>>         select 476FPE
>> +       select FORCE_PCI
>>         select PPC4xx_PCI_EXPRESS
>
> Would "select PPC4xx_PCI_EXPRESS if PCI" be a suitable alternative?

It would work, but I don't really like it because it means the
dependency on PCI is now encoded in two places.

I also doubt it reflects the intention of the original authors, because
at the time PCI was default y I suspect they never intended for PCI to
be disabled for that board.

cheers


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list