[PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a
Xiaowei Bao
xiaowei.bao at nxp.com
Wed Aug 28 13:25:43 AEST 2019
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray at arm.com>
> Sent: 2019年8月27日 22:49
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao at nxp.com>
> Cc: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>; mark.rutland at arm.com; Roy
> Zang <roy.zang at nxp.com>; lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.co; arnd at arndb.de;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org;
> linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; kishon at ti.com; M.h. Lian
> <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> gustavo.pimentel at synopsys.com; jingoohan1 at gmail.com;
> bhelgaas at google.com; Leo Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; shawnguo at kernel.org;
> Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for
> ls1088a and ls2088a
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 03:07:32AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: christophe leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>
> > > Sent: 2019年8月24日 14:45
> > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao at nxp.com>; Andrew Murray
> > > <andrew.murray at arm.com>
> > > Cc: mark.rutland at arm.com; Roy Zang <roy.zang at nxp.com>;
> > > lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.co; arnd at arndb.de; devicetree at vger.kernel.org;
> > > gregkh at linuxfoundation.org; linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org;
> > > linux-pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; kishon at ti.com;
> M.h.
> > > Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> > > gustavo.pimentel at synopsys.com; jingoohan1 at gmail.com;
> > > bhelgaas at google.com; Leo Li <leoyang.li at nxp.com>;
> > > shawnguo at kernel.org; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>;
> > > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support
> > > for ls1088a and ls2088a
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 24/08/2019 à 02:18, Xiaowei Bao a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray at arm.com>
> > > >> Sent: 2019年8月23日 22:28
> > > >> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao at nxp.com>
> > > >> Cc: bhelgaas at google.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> > > >> mark.rutland at arm.com; shawnguo at kernel.org; Leo Li
> > > >> <leoyang.li at nxp.com>; kishon at ti.com; lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.co;
> > > >> arnd at arndb.de; gregkh at linuxfoundation.org;
> > > M.h.
> > > >> Lian <minghuan.lian at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>;
> > > >> Roy Zang <roy.zang at nxp.com>; jingoohan1 at gmail.com;
> > > >> gustavo.pimentel at synopsys.com; linux-pci at vger.kernel.org;
> > > >> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org;
> > > >> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> > > >> linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode
> > > >> support for ls1088a and ls2088a
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:22:40PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > >>> Add PCIe EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a, there are some
> > > >>> difference between LS1 and LS2 platform, so refactor the code of
> > > >>> the EP driver.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao at nxp.com>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> v2:
> > > >>> - New mechanism for layerscape EP driver.
> > > >>
> > > >> Was there a v1 of this patch?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but I don't know how to comments, ^_^
> > >
> > > As far as I can see, in the previous version of the series
> > > (https://patch
> > >
> work.ozlabs.org%2Fproject%2Flinuxppc-dev%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3D125315
> > > %26state%3D*&data=02%7C01%7Cxiaowei.bao%40nxp.com%7C1b
> efe9
> > >
> a67c8046f9535e08d7285eaab6%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%
> > >
> 7C0%7C0%7C637022259387139020&sdata=p4wbycd04Z7qRUfAoZtwc
> > > UP7pR%2FuA3%2FjVcWMz6YyQVQ%3D&reserved=0),
> > > the 8/10 was something completely different, and I can't find any
> > > other patch in the series that could have been the v1 of this patch.
> >
> > Thanks, I will correct it to v1 in next version patch.
>
> I think you numbered it correctly (so please leave it as v2, referring to the
> patch series revision) - I got confused trying to find a previous version of this
> patch.
>
> Perhaps in the future when new patches are introduced in a series you can
> indicate that in the description patch revision history (e.g. introduced in v2).
OK, thanks for your help, I will update it in the next version patch.
Thanks
Xiaowei
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> >
> > >
> > > Christophe
> > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 76
> > > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > >>> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > >>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > >>> index 7ca5fe8..2a66f07 100644
> > > >>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > >>> @@ -20,27 +20,29 @@
> > > >>>
> > > >>> #define PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET 0x1000 /* DBI2 base address*/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > >>> - struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > >>> - struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > >>> +#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> +struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata {
> > > >>> + u32 func_offset;
> > > >>> + const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops *ops;
> > > >>> + const struct dw_pcie_ops *dw_pcie_ops;
> > > >>> };
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -#define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > >>> +struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > >>> + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > >>> + const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata *drvdata; };
> > > >>>
> > > >>> static int ls_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) {
> > > >>> return 0;
> > > >>> }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -static const struct dw_pcie_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > >>> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > >>> .start_link = ls_pcie_establish_link, };
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > >>> - { .compatible = "fsl,ls-pcie-ep",},
> > > >>> - { },
> > > >>> -};
> > > >>> -
> > > >>> static const struct pci_epc_features*
> > > >>> ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) { @@ -82,10
> > > >>> +84,44 @@ static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> func_no,
> > > >>> }
> > > >>> }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > >>> +static unsigned int ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select(struct dw_pcie_ep
> *ep,
> > > >>> + u8 func_no)
> > > >>> +{
> > > >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > >>> + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > >>> + u8 header_type;
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> + header_type = ioread8(pci->dbi_base + PCI_HEADER_TYPE);
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> + if (header_type & (1 << 7))
> > > >>> + return pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no;
> > > >>> + else
> > > >>> + return 0;
> > > >>
> > > >> It looks like there isn't a PCI define for multi function, the
> > > >> nearest I could find was PCI_HEADER_TYPE_MULTIDEVICE in
> > > >> hotplug/ibmphp.h. A comment above the test might be helpful to
> > > >> explain
> > > the test.
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I have not find the PCI_HEADER_TYPE_MULTIDEVICE define. OK, I
> > > > will add The comments in next version patch.
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> As the ls_pcie_ep_drvdata structures are static, the unset
> > > >> .func_offset will be initialised to 0, so you could just drop the test
> above.
> > > >
> > > > OK, thanks
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> However something to the effect of the following may help spot
> > > >> misconfiguration:
> > > >>
> > > >> WARN_ON(func_no && !pcie->drvdata->func_offset); return
> > > >> pcie->drvdata->func_offset * func_no;
> > > >
> > > > Thanks a lot, this looks better.
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> The WARN is probably quite useful as if you are attempting to use
> > > >> non-zero functions and func_offset isn't set - then things may
> > > >> appear to work normally but actually will break horribly.
> > > >
> > > > got it, thanks.
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >> Andrew Murray
> > > >>
> > > >>> +}
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> +static const struct dw_pcie_ep_ops ls_pcie_ep_ops = {
> > > >>> .ep_init = ls_pcie_ep_init,
> > > >>> .raise_irq = ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq,
> > > >>> .get_features = ls_pcie_ep_get_features,
> > > >>> + .func_conf_select = ls_pcie_ep_func_conf_select, };
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls1_ep_drvdata = {
> > > >>> + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > >>> + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, };
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> +static const struct ls_pcie_ep_drvdata ls2_ep_drvdata = {
> > > >>> + .func_offset = 0x20000,
> > > >>> + .ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops,
> > > >>> + .dw_pcie_ops = &dw_ls_pcie_ep_ops, };
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> +static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > >>> + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls1_ep_drvdata },
> > > >>> + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > >>> + { .compatible = "fsl,ls2088a-pcie-ep", .data = &ls2_ep_drvdata },
> > > >>> + { },
> > > >>> };
> > > >>>
> > > >>> static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie, @@
> > > >>> -98,7
> > > >>> +134,7 @@ static int __init ls_add_pcie_ep(struct ls_pcie_ep
> > > >>> +*pcie,
> > > >>> int ret;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ep = &pci->ep;
> > > >>> - ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops;
> > > >>> + ep->ops = pcie->drvdata->ops;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > >> "addr_space");
> > > >>> if (!res)
> > > >>> @@ -137,14 +173,11 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > >> platform_device *pdev)
> > > >>> if (!ls_epc)
> > > >>> return -ENOMEM;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> > > IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > >> "regs");
> > > >>> - pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > >>> - if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > >>> - return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > >>> + pcie->drvdata = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > >>> pci->dev = dev;
> > > >>> - pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > >>> + pci->ops = pcie->drvdata->dw_pcie_ops;
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> pcie->pci = pci;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false, @@ -152,6 +185,13 @@ static
> > > >>> int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > > >>>
> > > >>> + dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> > > IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > >> "regs");
> > > >>> + pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > >>> + if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > >>> + return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base);
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> + pci->dbi_base2 = pci->dbi_base + PCIE_DBI2_OFFSET;
> > > >>> +
> > > >>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > >>> --
> > > >>> 2.9.5
> > > >>>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par
> > > le logiciel antivirus Avast.
> > > https://www.
> > >
> avast.com%2Fantivirus&data=02%7C01%7Cxiaowei.bao%40nxp.com%7
> > >
> C1befe9a67c8046f9535e08d7285eaab6%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c3
> > >
> 01635%7C0%7C0%7C637022259387139020&sdata=JAYds7X%2FHVxgtrg
> > > e%2F%2FvnP84zdb2yReXcctQUiSLC11I%3D&reserved=0
> >
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list