[PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface
Vasant Hegde
hegdevasant at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Aug 23 01:36:30 AEST 2019
On 8/22/19 11:21 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:43 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>> Use "opal-msg-size" device tree property to allocate memory for "opal_msg".
>>
>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk at ozlabs.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Call BUG_ON, if we fail to allocate memory during init.
>>
>> -Vasant
>>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> index aba443be7daa..4f1f68f568bf 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(opal_write_lock);
>> static struct atomic_notifier_head opal_msg_notifier_head[OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX];
>> static uint32_t opal_heartbeat;
>> static struct task_struct *kopald_tsk;
>> +static struct opal_msg *opal_msg;
>> +static uint64_t opal_msg_size;
>>
>> void opal_configure_cores(void)
>> {
>> @@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type, void *msg)
>> static void opal_handle_message(void)
>> {
>> s64 ret;
>> - /*
>> - * TODO: pre-allocate a message buffer depending on opal-msg-size
>> - * value in /proc/device-tree.
>> - */
>> - static struct opal_msg msg;
>> u32 type;
>>
>> - ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(&msg), sizeof(msg));
>> + ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(opal_msg), opal_msg_size);
>> /* No opal message pending. */
>> if (ret == OPAL_RESOURCE)
>> return;
>> @@ -290,14 +287,14 @@ static void opal_handle_message(void)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - type = be32_to_cpu(msg.msg_type);
>> + type = be32_to_cpu(opal_msg->msg_type);
>>
>> /* Sanity check */
>> if (type >= OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
>> pr_warn_once("%s: Unknown message type: %u\n", __func__, type);
>> return;
>> }
>> - opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)&msg);
>> + opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)opal_msg);
>> }
>>
>> static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>> @@ -306,9 +303,21 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __init opal_message_init(void)
>> +static int __init opal_message_init(struct device_node *opal_node)
>> {
>> int ret, i, irq;
>
>> + const __be32 *val;
>> +
>> + val = of_get_property(opal_node, "opal-msg-size", NULL);
>> + if (val)
>> + opal_msg_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
>
> Use of_property_read_u32()
Yes. Will fix it.
>
>> +
>> + /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
>> + if (!opal_msg_size)
>> + opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
>> +
>> + opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>> + BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
>
> Seems questionable. Why not fall back to using a staticly allocated
> struct opal_msg? Or re-try the allocation with the size limited to
> sizeof(struct opal_msg)?
If we are not able to allocate memory during init then we have bigger problem.
No point in continuing. Hence added BUG_ON().
May be I can retry allocation with fixed size before calling BUG_ON().
How about something like below :
+ /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
+ if (!opal_msg_size)
+ opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
+
+ opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!opal_msg) {
+ opal_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct opal_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
+ }
-Vasant
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list