[PATCH 3/3] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges

[Santosh Sivaraj]

"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall at gmail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:25 PM Santosh Sivaraj <santosh at fossix.org> wrote:
>>
>> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
>> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh at fossix.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> index a5ac371a3f06..4d25c98a9835 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>> +#include <linux/nd.h>
>> +#include <asm/mce.h>
>>
>>  #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
>>
>> @@ -39,8 +41,12 @@ struct papr_scm_priv {
>>         struct resource res;
>>         struct nd_region *region;
>>         struct nd_interleave_set nd_set;
>> +       struct list_head list;
>
> list is not a meaningful name. call it something more descriptive.
>
>>  };
>>
>> +LIST_HEAD(papr_nd_regions);
>> +DEFINE_MUTEX(papr_ndr_lock);
>
> Should this be a mutex or a spinlock? I don't know what context the
> mce notifier is called from, but if it's not sleepable then a mutex
> will cause problems. Did you test this with lockdep enabled?

This would be a mutex, we are called from a blocking notifier.

>
>> +
>>  static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>>  {
>>         unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
>> @@ -364,6 +370,10 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>>                 dev_info(dev, "Region registered with target node %d and online node %d",
>>                          target_nid, online_nid);
>>
>> +       mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +       list_add_tail(&p->list, &papr_nd_regions);
>> +       mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +
>
> Where's the matching remove when we unbind the driver?

Missed it completely. Will fix it.

>
>>         return 0;
>>pp
>>  err:   nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>> @@ -371,6 +381,60 @@ err:       nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>>         return -ENXIO;
>>  }
>>
>> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>> +                        void *data)
>> +{
>> +       struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
>> +       struct papr_scm_priv *p;
>> +       u64 phys_addr;
>> +
>> +       if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
>> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +       if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
>> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +       phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
>> +               (evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
>
> Wait what? Why is physical_address page aligned, but effective_address
> not? Not a problem with this patch, but still, what the hell?

Not sure why, but its the way now. I can see if I can update it if it makes
sense in a later patch.

>
>> +       if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
>> +           !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +       mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +       list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, list) {
>> +               struct resource res = p->res;
>> +               u64 aligned_addr;
>> +
>
>> +               if (res.start > phys_addr)
>> +                       continue;
>> +
>> +               if (res.end < phys_addr)
>> +                       continue;
>
> surely there's a helper for this
>
>> +
>> +               aligned_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(phys_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> +               pr_debug("Add memory range (0x%llx -- 0x%llx) as bad range\n",
>> +                        aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> +
>> +               if (nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(p->bus,
>> +                                           aligned_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES))
>> +                       pr_warn("Failed to add bad range (0x%llx -- 0x%llx)\n",
>> +                               aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>> +
>> +               nvdimm_region_notify(p->region,
>> +                                    NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);
>> +
>> +               break;
>
> nit: you can avoid stacking indetation levels by breaking out of the
> loop as soon as you've found the region you're looking for.

True.

>
>> +       }
>> +       mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +
>> +       return NOTIFY_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
>> +       .notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
>> +};
>> +
>>  static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>         struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> @@ -456,6 +520,7 @@ static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 goto err2;
>>
>>         platform_set_drvdata(pdev, p);
>> +       mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>
> Either get rid of the global region list and have a notifier block in
> each device's driver private data, or keep the global list and
> register the notifier in module_init(). Re-registering the notifier
> each time a seperate device is probed seems very sketchy.

Registering the notifier in the init is simpler. I will change it.

>
>>         return 0;
>>
>> --
>> 2.21.0
p>>