[PATCH v12 09/31] mm: VMA sequence count
Laurent Dufour
ldufour at linux.ibm.com
Sat Apr 20 01:45:57 AEST 2019
Hi Jerome,
Thanks a lot for reviewing this series.
Le 19/04/2019 à 00:48, Jerome Glisse a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:45:00PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
>>
>> Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
>> counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.
>>
>> The calls to vm_write_begin/end() in unmap_page_range() are
>> used to detect when a VMA is being unmap and thus that new page fault
>> should not be satisfied for this VMA. If the seqcount hasn't changed when
>> the page table are locked, this means we are safe to satisfy the page
>> fault.
>>
>> The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
>> the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
>> re-checked the vma bounds against the address.
>>
>> The VMA's sequence counter is also used to detect change to various VMA's
>> fields used during the page fault handling, such as:
>> - vm_start, vm_end
>> - vm_pgoff
>> - vm_flags, vm_page_prot
>> - vm_policy
>
> ^ All above are under mmap write lock ?
Yes, changes are still made under the protection of the mmap_sem.
>
>> - anon_vma
>
> ^ This is either under mmap write lock or under page table lock
>
> So my question is do we need the complexity of seqcount_t for this ?
The sequence counter is used to detect write operation done while
readers (SPF handler) is running.
The implementation is quite simple (here without the lockdep checks):
static inline void raw_write_seqcount_begin(seqcount_t *s)
{
s->sequence++;
smp_wmb();
}
I can't see why this is too complex here, would you elaborate on this ?
>
> It seems that using regular int as counter and also relying on vm_flags
> when vma is unmap should do the trick.
vm_flags is not enough I guess an some operation are not impacting the
vm_flags at all (resizing for instance).
Am I missing something ?
>
> vma_delete(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> ...
> /*
> * Make sure the vma is mark as invalid ie neither read nor write
> * so that speculative fault back off. A racing speculative fault
> * will either see the flags as 0 or the new seqcount.
> */
> vma->vm_flags = 0;
> smp_wmb();
> vma->seqcount++;
> ...
> }
Well I don't think we can safely clear the vm_flags this way when the
VMA is unmap, I think it is used later when cleaning is doen.
Later in this series, the VMA deletion is managed when the VMA is
unlinked from the RB Tree. That is checked using the vm_rb field's
value, and managed using RCU.
> Then:
> speculative_fault_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
> {
> ...
> spvmf->seqcount = vma->seqcount;
> smp_rmb();
> spvmf->vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
> if (!spvmf->vm_flags) {
> // Back off the vma is dying ...
> ...
> }
> }
>
> bool speculative_fault_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct spec_vmf *spvmf)
> {
> ...
> seqcount = vma->seqcount;
> smp_rmb();
> vm_flags = vma->vm_flags;
>
> if (spvmf->vm_flags != vm_flags || seqcount != spvmf->seqcount) {
> // Something did change for the vma
> return false;
> }
> return true;
> }
>
> This would also avoid the lockdep issue described below. But maybe what
> i propose is stupid and i will see it after further reviewing thing.
That's true that the lockdep is quite annoying here. But it is still
interesting to keep in the loop to avoid 2 subsequent
write_seqcount_begin() call being made in the same context (which would
lead to an even sequence counter value while write operation is in
progress). So I think this is still a good thing to have lockdep
available here.
>
> Cheers,
> Jérôme
>
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz at infradead.org>
>>
>> [Port to 4.12 kernel]
>> [Build depends on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
>> [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on
>> CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
>> [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by
>> using vm_raw_write* functions]
>> [Fix a lock dependency warning in mmap_region() when entering the error
>> path]
>> [move sequence initialisation INIT_VMA()]
>> [Review the patch description about unmap_page_range()]
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mm.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++
>> mm/memory.c | 2 ++
>> mm/mmap.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index 2ceb1d2869a6..906b9e06f18e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -1410,6 +1410,9 @@ struct zap_details {
>> static inline void INIT_VMA(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> {
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> + seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +#endif
>> }
>>
>> struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> @@ -1534,6 +1537,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping,
>> unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0);
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> + write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + int subclass)
>> +{
>> + write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> + write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> + raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> + raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> + int subclass)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */
>> +
>> extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
>> void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags);
>> extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> index fd7d38ee2e33..e78f72eb2576 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> @@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>> struct mempolicy *vm_policy; /* NUMA policy for the VMA */
>> #endif
>> struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> + seqcount_t vm_sequence;
>> +#endif
>> } __randomize_layout;
>>
>> struct core_thread {
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index d5bebca47d98..423fa8ea0569 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -1256,6 +1256,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>> unsigned long next;
>>
>> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
>> + vm_write_begin(vma);
>> tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
>> pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
>> do {
>> @@ -1265,6 +1266,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>> next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
>> } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>> tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
>> + vm_write_end(vma);
>> }
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index 5ad3a3228d76..a4e4d52a5148 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -726,6 +726,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>> long adjust_next = 0;
>> int remove_next = 0;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ?
>> + *
>> + * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving
>> + * 3 locks:
>> + * mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim
>> + *
>> + * Here are the major path leading to this dependency :
>> + * 1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem
>> + * 2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim
>> + * 3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem
>> + * 4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence
>> + *
>> + * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in
>> + * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted
>> + * VMAs are not yet known.
>> + * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will
>> + * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait
>> + * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault().
>> + */
>> + vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
>> + if (next)
>> + vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>> +
>> if (next && !insert) {
>> struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
>>
>> @@ -950,6 +974,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>> * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
>> */
>> next = vma->vm_next;
>> + if (next)
>> + vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>> } else {
>> /*
>> * For the scope of the comment "next" and
>> @@ -996,6 +1022,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>> if (insert && file)
>> uprobe_mmap(insert);
>>
>> + if (next && next != vma)
>> + vm_raw_write_end(next);
>> + vm_raw_write_end(vma);
>> +
>> validate_mm(mm);
>>
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list