[EXT] Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: replace the process_option table with function
Nicolin Chen
nicoleotsuka at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 03:54:24 AEST 2019
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:34:05AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 08:26:59AM +0000, S.j. Wang wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to update the table? It'd be way quicker to use
> > > > lookup table than real-time calculation all the time. I believe you
> > > > can simply calculate all the values out for 12KHz and 24KHz since
> > > > you have the function. If there are certain combinations of these
> > > > two not being supported, then we could mark it with a special value and
> > add an if-check to error out.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, but I think the function should be more flexible, if someday we
> > > need to support Other sample rate, only need to update the list.
> >
> > Given the fact that the owner of the function cannot give more comments, I
> > feel the function wouldn't be very maintainable as none of us understands it
> > well. On the other hand, you'll need to update the supported I/O rate lists
> > anyway, so why not just update the table as well? The supported sample
> > rates from ALSA are limited too. Overall, I think that continue using a lookup
> > table wins.
>
> Alsa support SNDRV_PCM_RATE_KNOT, we can define the rate that we want
> To support, and use function is more flexible, and we have use the function
> Internally for long time, it is stable😊
OK. I will try to indulge it. Let's see your next version first.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list