[EXT] Re: [PATCH V1] ASoC: fsl_esai: replace fall-through with break

Nicolin Chen nicoleotsuka at gmail.com
Tue Apr 9 13:54:52 AEST 2019


Hi Gustavo,

On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:20:25PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c index
> >>> c7410bbfd2af..bad0dfed6b68 100644
> >>> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
> >>> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_esai.c
> >>> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int fsl_esai_set_dai_sysclk(struct
> >> snd_soc_dai *dai, int clk_id,
> >>>               break;
> >>>       case ESAI_HCKT_EXTAL:
> >>>               ecr |= ESAI_ECR_ETI;
> >>
> >> Also, you should use a simple assignment operator "=" instead of "|=" in
> >> both cases.
> > 
> > The result is same for "=" and "|=", because there is "ecr = 0" in beginning of
> > This function. 
> > 
> 
> Following that same logic, then why not use "+=" instead?
> 
> The point is: is "|=" or any other assignment operator other than "=" necessary?
> The answer in this case is: no, it is not.  So, go for the simple one and avoid
> any unnecessary confusion.

I would like to keep "|=" here, just in case that someday it'd be easier
to insert something to ecr before this chunk. So please get easy on this
one.

Thanks
Nicolin


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list