[PATCH 03/12] powerpc/64s/hash: move POWER5 < DD2.1 slbie workaround where it is needed
Nicholas Piggin
npiggin at gmail.com
Mon Sep 17 18:39:10 AEST 2018
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 11:30:16 +0530
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Nicholas Piggin <npiggin at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > The POWER5 < DD2.1 issue is that slbie needs to be issued more than
> > once. It came in with this change:
> >
> > ChangeSet at 1.1608, 2004-04-29 07:12:31-07:00, david at gibson.dropbear.id.au
> > [PATCH] POWER5 erratum workaround
> >
> > Early POWER5 revisions (<DD2.1) have a problem requiring slbie
> > instructions to be repeated under some circumstances. The patch below
> > adds a workaround (patch made by Anton Blanchard).
>
> Thanks for extracting this. Can we add this to the code?
The comment? Sure.
> Also I am not
> sure what is repeated here? Is it that we just need one slb extra(hence
> only applicable to offset == 1) or is it that we need to make sure there
> is always one slb extra? The code does the former.
Yeah it has always done the former, so my assumption is that you just
need more than one slbie. I don't think we need to bother revisiting
that assumption unless someone can pull up something definitive.
What I did change is that slbia no longer has the additional slbie, but
I think there are strong reasons not to need that.
> Do you a have link for
> that email patch?
I tried looking through the archives around that date but could not
find it. That came from a bitkeeper log.
Thanks,
Nick
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list