[PATCH 2/2] selftests/powerpc: Skip test instead of failing

Breno Leitao leitao at debian.org
Thu Oct 25 01:11:12 AEDT 2018


Hi Tyrel,

On 10/23/2018 05:41 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/core-pkey.c
>> @@ -352,17 +352,11 @@ static int write_core_pattern(const char *core_pattern)
>>  	FILE *f;
>>
>>  	f = fopen(core_pattern_file, "w");
>> -	if (!f) {
>> -		perror("Error writing to core_pattern file");
>> -		return TEST_FAIL;
>> -	}
>> +	SKIP_IF(!f);
>>
>>  	ret = fwrite(core_pattern, 1, len, f);
>>  	fclose(f);
>> -	if (ret != len) {
>> -		perror("Error writing to core_pattern file");
>> -		return TEST_FAIL;
>> -	}
>> +	SKIP_IF(ret != len);

> If we don't have proper privileges we should fail on the open, right?
> So wouldn't we still want to fail on the write if something goes
> wrong?

That is a good point. Should the test fail or skip if it is not possible
to create the infrastructure to run the core test?

Trying to find the answer in the current test sets, I find tests where
the self test skips if the test environment is not able to be set up, as
for example, when a memory allocation fails.

File: tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/alignment/alignment_handler.c

        ci1 = mmap(NULL, bufsize, PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED,
                   fd, bufsize);
        if ((ci0 == MAP_FAILED) || (ci1 == MAP_FAILED)) {
                printf("\n");
                perror("mmap failed");
                SKIP_IF(1);
        }


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list