[PATCH] powerpc: use PTRRELOC during early init
Christophe LEROY
christophe.leroy at c-s.fr
Wed Oct 3 16:22:08 AEST 2018
Hi Andreas,
Le 03/10/2018 à 00:33, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
> This fixes a crash on powerpc32 when using global data during early init
> without relocating its address.
>
> Fixes: 51c3c62b58 (powerpc: Avoid code patching freed init sections)
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> index 6ae2777c22..6192fdae36 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int __patch_instruction(unsigned int *exec_addr, unsigned int instr,
> int err;
>
> /* Make sure we aren't patching a freed init section */
> - if (init_mem_is_free && init_section_contains(exec_addr, 4)) {
> + if (*PTRRELOC(&init_mem_is_free) && init_section_contains(exec_addr, 4)) {
That's not the best solution. In the past we already did our best to
separate early use of patch_instruction() , that's how
raw_patch_instruction() was born, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/840974/
Here, it idea is similar, this test should not apply to
raw_patch_instruction()
Did you try my proposed fix https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/977195/ ?
Christophe
> pr_debug("Skipping init section patching addr: 0x%px\n", exec_addr);
> return 0;
> }
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list