[PATCH v03 4/5] migration/memory: Evaluate LMB assoc changes
Tyrel Datwyler
tyreld at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Oct 3 07:08:04 AEST 2018
On 10/01/2018 06:00 AM, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> migration/memory: This patch adds code that recognizes changes to
> the associativity of memory blocks described by the device-tree
> properties in order to drive equivalent 'hotplug' operations to
> update local and general kernel data structures to reflect those
> changes. These differences may include:
>
> * Evaluate 'ibm,dynamic-memory' properties when processing the
> updated device-tree properties of the system during Post Migration
> events (migration_store). The new functionality looks for changes
> to the aa_index values for each drc_index/LMB to identify any memory
> blocks that should be readded.
>
> * In an LPAR migration scenario, the "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays"
> property may change. In the event that a row of the array differs,
> locate all assigned memory blocks with that 'aa_index' and 're-add'
> them to the system memory block data structures. In the process of
> the 're-add', the system routines will update the corresponding entry
> for the memory in the LMB structures and any other relevant kernel
> data structures.
>
> A number of previous extensions made to the DRMEM code for scanning
> device-tree properties and creating LMB arrays are used here to
> ensure that the resulting code is simpler and more usable:
>
> * Use new paired list iterator for the DRMEM LMB info arrays to find
> differences in old and new versions of properties.
> * Use new iterator for copies of the DRMEM info arrays to evaluate
> completely new structures.
> * Combine common code for parsing and evaluating memory description
> properties based on the DRMEM LMB array model to greatly simplify
> extension from the older property 'ibm,dynamic-memory' to the new
> property model of 'ibm,dynamic-memory-v2'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v03:
> -- Modify the code that parses the memory affinity attributes to
> mark relevant DRMEM LMB array entries using the internal_flags
> mechanism instead of generate unique hotplug actions for each
> memory block to be readded. The change is intended to both
> simplify the code, and to require fewer resources on systems
> with huge amounts of memory.
> -- Save up notice about any all LMB entries until the end of the
> 'migration_store' operation at which point a single action is
> queued to scan the entire DRMEM array.
> -- Add READD_MULTIPLE function for memory that scans the DRMEM
> array to identify multiple entries that were marked previously.
> The corresponding memory blocks are to be readded to the system
> to update relevant data structures outside of the powerpc-
> specific code.
> -- Change dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_action to directly queue worker
> to pseries work queue.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 220 +++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c | 4
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h | 4
> 3 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index c1578f5..68bde2e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -561,8 +561,11 @@ static int dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(u32 drc_index)
> }
> }
>
> - if (!lmb_found)
> - rc = -EINVAL;
> + if (!lmb_found) {
> + pr_info("Failed to update memory for drc index %lx\n",
> + (unsigned long) drc_index);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> if (rc)
> pr_info("Failed to update memory at %llx\n",
> @@ -573,6 +576,30 @@ static int dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(u32 drc_index)
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static int dlpar_memory_readd_multiple(void)
> +{
> + struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
> + int rc;
> +
> + pr_info("Attempting to update multiple LMBs\n");
> +
> + for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
> + if (drmem_lmb_update(lmb)) {
> + rc = dlpar_remove_lmb(lmb);
> +
> + if (!rc) {
> + rc = dlpar_add_lmb(lmb);
> + if (rc)
> + dlpar_release_drc(lmb->drc_index);
> + }
> +
> + drmem_remove_lmb_update(lmb);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
Actually, in retrospect this function should have been independently implemented in your 3rd patch where you define the flag. So, disregard moving the define into this patch and instead move the function implementation into patch 3 where the commit message talks about adding this operation.
> static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
> {
> struct drmem_lmb *lmb, *start_lmb, *end_lmb;
> @@ -673,6 +700,10 @@ static int dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(u32 drc_index)
> {
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> +static int dlpar_memory_readd_multiple(void)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
Same as above commit obviously.
>
> static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
> {
> @@ -952,6 +983,9 @@ int dlpar_memory(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
> drc_index = hp_elog->_drc_u.drc_index;
> rc = dlpar_memory_readd_by_index(drc_index);
> break;
> + case PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_READD_MULTIPLE:
> + rc = dlpar_memory_readd_multiple();
> + break;
And this as well.
-Tyrel
> default:
> pr_err("Invalid action (%d) specified\n", hp_elog->action);
> rc = -EINVAL;
> @@ -994,13 +1028,43 @@ static int pseries_add_mem_node(struct device_node *np)
> return (ret < 0) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> }
>
> -static int pseries_update_drconf_memory(struct of_reconfig_data *pr)
> +static int pmt_changes = 0;
> +
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_set(void)
> +{
> + pmt_changes = 1;
> +}
> +
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_clear(void)
> +{
> + pmt_changes = 0;
> +}
> +
> +int dlpar_memory_pmt_changes(void)
> +{
> + return pmt_changes;
> +}
> +
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_action(void)
> +{
> + if (dlpar_memory_pmt_changes()) {
> + struct pseries_hp_errorlog hp_errlog;
> +
> + hp_errlog.resource = PSERIES_HP_ELOG_RESOURCE_MEM;
> + hp_errlog.action = PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ACTION_READD_MULTIPLE;
> + hp_errlog.id_type = 0;
> +
> + queue_hotplug_event(&hp_errlog, NULL, NULL);
> +
> + dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_clear();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int pseries_update_drconf_memory(struct drmem_lmb_info *new_dinfo)
> {
> - struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *new_drmem, *old_drmem;
> + struct drmem_lmb *old_lmb, *new_lmb;
> unsigned long memblock_size;
> - u32 entries;
> - __be32 *p;
> - int i, rc = -EINVAL;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> if (rtas_hp_event)
> return 0;
> @@ -1009,42 +1073,122 @@ static int pseries_update_drconf_memory(struct of_reconfig_data *pr)
> if (!memblock_size)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - p = (__be32 *) pr->old_prop->value;
> - if (!p)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - /* The first int of the property is the number of lmb's described
> - * by the property. This is followed by an array of of_drconf_cell
> - * entries. Get the number of entries and skip to the array of
> - * of_drconf_cell's.
> - */
> - entries = be32_to_cpu(*p++);
> - old_drmem = (struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *)p;
> + /* Arrays should have the same size and DRC indexes */
> + for_each_pair_dinfo_lmb(drmem_info, old_lmb, new_dinfo, new_lmb) {
>
> - p = (__be32 *)pr->prop->value;
> - p++;
> - new_drmem = (struct of_drconf_cell_v1 *)p;
> + if (new_lmb->drc_index != old_lmb->drc_index)
> + continue;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
> - if ((be32_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].flags) & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED) &&
> - (!(be32_to_cpu(new_drmem[i].flags) & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))) {
> + if ((old_lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED) &&
> + (!(new_lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))) {
> rc = pseries_remove_memblock(
> - be64_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].base_addr),
> - memblock_size);
> + old_lmb->base_addr, memblock_size);
> break;
> - } else if ((!(be32_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].flags) &
> - DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) &&
> - (be32_to_cpu(new_drmem[i].flags) &
> - DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) {
> - rc = memblock_add(be64_to_cpu(old_drmem[i].base_addr),
> - memblock_size);
> + } else if ((!(old_lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) &&
> + (new_lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) {
> + rc = memblock_add(old_lmb->base_addr,
> + memblock_size);
> rc = (rc < 0) ? -EINVAL : 0;
> break;
> + } else if ((old_lmb->aa_index != new_lmb->aa_index) &&
> + (new_lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) {
> + drmem_mark_lmb_update(old_lmb);
> + dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_set();
> }
> }
> return rc;
> }
>
> +static void pseries_update_ala_memory_aai(int aa_index)
> +{
> + struct drmem_lmb *lmb;
> +
> + /* Readd all LMBs which were previously using the
> + * specified aa_index value.
> + */
> + for_each_drmem_lmb(lmb) {
> + if ((lmb->aa_index == aa_index) &&
> + (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED)) {
> + drmem_mark_lmb_update(lmb);
> + dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_set();
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +struct assoc_arrays {
> + u32 n_arrays;
> + u32 array_sz;
> + const __be32 *arrays;
> +};
> +
> +static int pseries_update_ala_memory(struct of_reconfig_data *pr)
> +{
> + struct assoc_arrays new_ala, old_ala;
> + __be32 *p;
> + int i, lim;
> +
> + if (rtas_hp_event)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * The layout of the ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays
> + * property is a number N indicating the number of
> + * associativity arrays, followed by a number M
> + * indicating the size of each associativity array,
> + * followed by a list of N associativity arrays.
> + */
> +
> + p = (__be32 *) pr->old_prop->value;
> + if (!p)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + old_ala.n_arrays = of_read_number(p++, 1);
> + old_ala.array_sz = of_read_number(p++, 1);
> + old_ala.arrays = p;
> +
> + p = (__be32 *) pr->prop->value;
> + if (!p)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + new_ala.n_arrays = of_read_number(p++, 1);
> + new_ala.array_sz = of_read_number(p++, 1);
> + new_ala.arrays = p;
> +
> + lim = (new_ala.n_arrays > old_ala.n_arrays) ? old_ala.n_arrays :
> + new_ala.n_arrays;
> +
> + if (old_ala.array_sz == new_ala.array_sz) {
> +
> + /* Reset any entries where the old and new rows
> + * the array have changed.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < lim; i++) {
> + int index = (i * new_ala.array_sz);
> +
> + if (!memcmp(&old_ala.arrays[index],
> + &new_ala.arrays[index],
> + new_ala.array_sz))
> + continue;
> +
> + pseries_update_ala_memory_aai(i);
> + }
> +
> + /* Reset any entries representing the extra rows.
> + * There shouldn't be any, but just in case ...
> + */
> + for (i = lim; i < new_ala.n_arrays; i++)
> + pseries_update_ala_memory_aai(i);
> +
> + } else {
> + /* Update all entries representing these rows;
> + * as all rows have different sizes, none can
> + * have equivalent values.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < lim; i++)
> + pseries_update_ala_memory_aai(i);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> unsigned long action, void *data)
> {
> @@ -1059,8 +1203,16 @@ static int pseries_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> err = pseries_remove_mem_node(rd->dn);
> break;
> case OF_RECONFIG_UPDATE_PROPERTY:
> - if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name, "ibm,dynamic-memory"))
> - err = pseries_update_drconf_memory(rd);
> + if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name, "ibm,dynamic-memory")) {
> + struct drmem_lmb_info *dinfo =
> + drmem_lmbs_init(rd->prop);
> + if (!dinfo)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + err = pseries_update_drconf_memory(dinfo);
> + drmem_lmbs_free(dinfo);
> + } else if (!strcmp(rd->prop->name,
> + "ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays"))
> + err = pseries_update_ala_memory(rd);
> break;
> }
> return notifier_from_errno(err);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> index 23fb9ac..6c0456f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,10 @@ static ssize_t migration_store(struct class *class,
> return rc;
>
> post_mobility_fixup();
> +
> + /* Apply any necessary changes identified during fixup */
> + dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_action();
> +
> return count;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
> index 60db2ee..b238634 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ static inline int dlpar_memory(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> #endif
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_set(void);
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_clear(void);
> +int dlpar_memory_pmt_changes(void);
> +void dlpar_memory_pmt_changes_action(void);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> int dlpar_cpu(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog);
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list