[1/9] powerpc/64s: Include cpu header

[Michael Ellerman]

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 14:54:12 UTC, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Current powerpc security.c file is defining functions, as
> cpu_show_meltdown(), cpu_show_spectre_v{1,2} and others, that are being
> declared at linux/cpu.h header without including the header file that
> contains these declarations.
> 
> This is being reported by sparse, which thinks that these functions are
> static, due to the lack of declaration:
> 
> 	arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:105:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_meltdown' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 	arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:139:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v1' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 	arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:161:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spectre_v2' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 	arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:209:6: warning: symbol 'stf_barrier' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 	arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c:289:9: warning: symbol 'cpu_show_spec_store_bypass' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> This patch simply includes the proper header (linux/cpu.h) to match
> function definition and declaration.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao at debian.org>

Series applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/42e2acde1237878462b028f5a27d9c

cheers