[PATCH kernel v3 06/22] powerpc/powernv: Detach npu struct from pnv_phb
Alexey Kardashevskiy
aik at ozlabs.ru
Mon Nov 19 18:18:11 AEDT 2018
On 14/11/2018 15:28, Alistair Popple wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
>
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 7:28:07 PM AEDT Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> static struct npu *npdev_to_npu(struct pci_dev *npdev)
>> {
>> - struct pnv_phb *nphb;
>> + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus);
>> + struct npu *npu;
>>
>> - nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
>> + list_for_each_entry(npu, &npu2_devices, next)
>
> This is called from the ATSD path which is (or at least has been) quite a
> performance critical path so searching through all the NPUs in a list may be
> problematic.
>
> I guess currently it wont make any practical difference as we only ever have 2
> NPUs, but in future they may get divided into more logical NPUs. Would it be
> possible to store a back-pointer somewhere so we can avoid the lookup?
It is quite possible even now with iommu_group_get() + container_of() +
iommu_group_put(), I'll try that in respin.
>
>> + if (hose == npu->hose)
>> + return npu;
>>
>> - return &nphb->npu;
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>> + return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> /* Maximum number of nvlinks per npu */
>> @@ -505,6 +531,9 @@ static void acquire_atsd_reg(struct npu_context
>> *npu_context, continue;
>>
>> npu = npdev_to_npu(npdev);
>> + if (!npu)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> mmio_atsd_reg[i].npu = npu;
>> mmio_atsd_reg[i].reg = get_mmio_atsd_reg(npu);
>> while (mmio_atsd_reg[i].reg < 0) {
>> @@ -701,6 +730,8 @@ struct npu_context *pnv_npu2_init_context(struct pci_dev
>> *gpdev,
>>
>> nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
>> npu = npdev_to_npu(npdev);
>> + if (!npu)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> /*
>> * Setup the NPU context table for a particular GPU. These need to be
>> @@ -821,6 +852,8 @@ void pnv_npu2_destroy_context(struct npu_context
>> *npu_context,
>>
>> nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
>> npu = npdev_to_npu(npdev);
>> + if (!npu)
>> + return;
>> nvlink_dn = of_parse_phandle(npdev->dev.of_node, "ibm,nvlink", 0);
>> if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(nvlink_dn, "ibm,npu-link-index",
>> &nvlink_index)))
>> @@ -898,9 +931,15 @@ int pnv_npu2_init(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>> struct pci_dev *gpdev;
>> static int npu_index;
>> uint64_t rc = 0;
>> + struct pci_controller *hose = phb->hose;
>> + struct npu *npu;
>> + int ret;
>>
>> - phb->npu.nmmu_flush =
>> - of_property_read_bool(phb->hose->dn, "ibm,nmmu-flush");
>> + npu = kzalloc(sizeof(*npu), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!npu)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + npu->nmmu_flush = of_property_read_bool(hose->dn, "ibm,nmmu-flush");
>> for_each_child_of_node(phb->hose->dn, dn) {
>> gpdev = pnv_pci_get_gpu_dev(get_pci_dev(dn));
>> if (gpdev) {
>> @@ -914,18 +953,31 @@ int pnv_npu2_init(struct pnv_phb *phb)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - for (i = 0; !of_property_read_u64_index(phb->hose->dn, "ibm,mmio-atsd",
>> + for (i = 0; !of_property_read_u64_index(hose->dn, "ibm,mmio-atsd",
>> i, &mmio_atsd); i++)
>> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_regs[i] = ioremap(mmio_atsd, 32);
>> + npu->mmio_atsd_regs[i] = ioremap(mmio_atsd, 32);
>>
>> - pr_info("NPU%lld: Found %d MMIO ATSD registers", phb->opal_id, i);
>> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_count = i;
>> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_usage = 0;
>> + pr_info("NPU%d: Found %d MMIO ATSD registers", hose->global_number, i);
>> + npu->mmio_atsd_count = i;
>> + npu->mmio_atsd_usage = 0;
>> npu_index++;
>> - if (WARN_ON(npu_index >= NV_MAX_NPUS))
>> - return -ENOSPC;
>> + if (WARN_ON(npu_index >= NV_MAX_NPUS)) {
>> + ret = -ENOSPC;
>> + goto fail_exit;
>> + }
>> max_npu2_index = npu_index;
>> - phb->npu.index = npu_index;
>> + npu->index = npu_index;
>> + npu->hose = hose;
>> +
>> + list_add(&npu->next, &npu2_devices);
>
> Guess we don't need any locking here as the list gets setup once during boot
> long before loading the driver and is never modified right?
Correct.
>
> - Alistair
>
>> return 0;
>> +
>> +fail_exit:
>> + for (i = 0; i < npu->mmio_atsd_count; ++i)
>> + iounmap(npu->mmio_atsd_regs[i]);
>> +
>> + kfree(npu);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> }
>
>
--
Alexey
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list